No abstract

Background:The Thinking Healthy Programme (THP) is a psychological intervention recommended for the treatment of perinatal depression. We assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of THP delivered by peers (THPP) in Goa, India. Methods:In this single-blind, individually-randomised controlled trial, we recruited pregnant women aged ≥18 years attending antenatal clinics, who scored ≥10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to THPP plus enhanced usual care (EUC), or to EUC alone in randomly-sized blocks, stratified by area of residence. Allocation was concealed using sequentiallynumbered opaque envelopes. Primary outcomes were severity of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score) and remission (PHQ-9 score <5) 6 months post-birth assessed by researchers masked to the treatment allocation. Analyses were by intention to treat, adjusting for covariates defined a priori or that showed imbalance at baseline. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02104232).Findings: 280 women were enrolled between 24th October 2014 and 22nd June 2016 (140 per group). At 6 months, 122 (87%) and 129 (92%) women in the THPP plus EUC, and EUC alone groups, respectively, contributed primary outcome data. There was evidence of higher prevalence of remission at 6 months in the THPP plus EUC versus EUC alone group (n=89 (73%) versus n=77 (60%), respectively; prevalence ratio (PR)=1·21; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·01 to 1·45, p=0·04), but weaker evidence for lower symptom severity (mean 3·47, standard deviation (SD) 4·49 versus 4·48 (SD=5·11), respectively; standardised mean difference (SMD)=-0·18; 95% CI -0·43 to 0·07, p=0·16).Repeated measures analyses over the duration of the trial (measured at 3 and 6 months post-birth) showed beneficial effects on symptom severity (SMD -0·37, 95% CI -0·88 to -0·24, p=0·01), remission (PR=1·21, 95% CI 1·01 to 1·41, p=0·02), WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO-DAS) scores (SMD=-0·32, 95% CI -0·76 to -0·21, p=0·02) and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) scores (SMD=0·51, 95% CI 0·43 to 1·20, p=0·02). . The incremental societal cost per unit improvement on PHQ-9 was -US$ 29·64 (95% CI-32·88 to -26·41) at 3 months, and -US$93·53 (95% CI -180·21 to -6·84) for the whole duration of the trial, with a 87% likelihood of being costsaving in the study setting. The mean cost of providing THPP was US$ 1·36 per beneficiary (95% CI 1·32 to 1·39). There was no evidence of differences in serious adverse events by group, except stigmatisation was more often reported in the EUC alone (9%) versus the THPP plus EUC group (4%; p=0·08).Interpretation: THPP had a moderate effect on symptom severity and remission from perinatal depression over the 6 month post-natal period. THPP is relatively cheap to deliver and pays for itself through reduced health care, time and productivity costs. Funding: NIMH

IntroductionEfforts to increase awareness of HIV status have led to growing interest in community-based models of HIV testing. Maximizing the benefits of such programmes requires timely linkage to care and treatment. Thus, an understanding of linkage and its potential barriers is imperative for scale-up.MethodsThis study was conducted in rural South Africa. HIV-positive clients (n=492) identified through home-based HIV counselling and testing (HBHCT) were followed up to assess linkage to care, defined as obtaining a CD4 count. Among 359 eligible clients, we calculated the proportion that linked to care within three months. For 226 clients with available data, we calculated the median CD4. To determine factors associated with the rate of linkage, Cox regression was performed on a subsample of 196 clients with additional data on socio-demographic factors and personal characteristics.ResultsWe found that 62.1% (95% CI: 55.7 to 68.5%) of clients from the primary sample (n=359) linked to care within three months of HBHCT. Among those who linked, the median CD4 count was 341 cells/mm3 (interquartile range [IQR] 224 to 542 cells/mm3). In the subsample of 196 clients, factors predictive of increased linkage included the following: believing that drugs/supplies were available at the health facility (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.78; 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.96); experiencing three or more depression symptoms (aHR 2.09; 95% CI: 1.24 to 3.53); being a caregiver for four or more people (aHR 1.93; 95% CI: 1.07 to 3.47); and knowing someone who died of HIV/AIDS (aHR 1.68; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.49). Factors predictive of decreased linkage included the following: younger age – 15 to 24 years (aHR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.91); living with two or more adults (aHR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.77); not believing or being unsure about the test results (aHR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.77); difficulty finding time to seek health care (aHR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.67); believing that antiretroviral treatment can make you sick (aHR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.89); and drinking alcohol (aHR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.80).ConclusionsThe findings highlight barriers to linkage following an increasingly popular model of HIV testing. Further, they draw attention to ways in which practical interventions and health education strategies could be used to improve linkage to care.

Objective To assess the effect of home based HIV counselling and testing on the prevalence of HIV testing and reported behavioural changes in a rural subdistrict of South Africa.Design Cluster randomised controlled trial.Setting 16 communities (clusters) in uMzimkhulu subdistrict, KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.Participants 4154 people aged 14 years or more who participated in a community survey.Intervention Lay counsellors conducted door to door outreach and offered home based HIV counselling and testing to all consenting adults and adolescents aged 14-17 years with guardian consent. Control clusters received standard care, which consisted of HIV counselling and testing services at local clinics.Main outcome measures Primary outcome measure was prevalence of testing for HIV. Other outcomes were HIV awareness, stigma, sexual behaviour, vulnerability to violence, and access to care.Results Overall, 69% of participants in the home based HIV counselling and testing arm versus 47% in the control arm were tested for HIV during the study period (prevalence ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 1.81). More couples in the intervention arm had counselling and testing together than in the control arm (2.24, 1.49 to 3.03). The intervention had broader effects beyond HIV testing, with a 55% reduction in multiple partners (0.45, 0.33 to 0.62) and a stronger effect among those who had an HIV test (0.37, 0.24 to 0.58) and a 45% reduction in casual sexual partners (0.55, 0.42 to 0.73).Conclusions Home based HIV counselling and testing increased the prevalence of HIV testing in a rural setting with high levels of stigma. Benefits also included higher uptake of couple counselling and testing and reduced sexual risk behaviour. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31271935.

No abstract

IntroductionThere is growing evidence concerning the acceptability and feasibility of home-based HIV testing. However, less is known about the cost-effectiveness of the approach yet it is a critical component to guide decisions about scaling up access to HIV testing. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of a home-based HIV testing intervention in rural South Africa.MethodsTwo alternatives: clinic and home-based HIV counselling and testing were compared. Costs were analysed from a provider’s perspective for the period of January to December 2010. The outcome, HIV counselling and testing (HCT) uptake was obtained from the Good Start home-based HIV counselling and testing (HBHCT) cluster randomised control trial undertaken in KwaZulu-Natal province. Cost-effectiveness was estimated for a target population of 22,099 versus 23,864 people for intervention and control communities respectively. Average costs were calculated as the cost per client tested, while cost-effectiveness was calculated as the cost per additional client tested through HBHCT.ResultsBased on effectiveness of 37% in the intervention (HBHCT) arm compared to 16% in control arm, home based testing costs US$29 compared to US$38 per person for clinic HCT. The incremental cost effectiveness per client tested using HBHCT was $19.ConclusionsHBHCT was less costly and more effective. Home-based HCT could present a cost-effective alternative for rural ‘hard to reach’ populations depending on affordability by the health system, and should be considered as part of community outreach programs.

BackgroundHIV counselling and testing (HCT) is a critical gateway for addressing HIV prevention and linking people to treatment, care, and support. Since national testing rates are often less than optimal, there is growing interest in expanding testing coverage through the implementation of innovative models such as home-based HIV counselling and testing (HBHCT). With the aim of informing scale up, this paper discusses client characteristics and acceptability of an HBHCT intervention implemented in rural South Africa.MethodsTrained lay counsellors offered door-to-door rapid HIV testing in a rural sub-district of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Household and client data were captured on cellular phones and transmitted to a web-based data management system. Descriptive analysis was undertaken to examine client characteristics, testing history, HBHCT uptake, and reasons for refusal. Chi-square tests were performed to assess the association between client characteristics and uptake.ResultsLay counsellors visited 3,328 households and tested 75% (5,086) of the 6,757 people met. The majority of testers (73.7%) were female, and 57% had never previously tested. With regard to marital status, 1,916 (37.7%), 2,123 (41.7%), and 818 (16.1%) were single, married, and widowed, respectively. Testers ranged in age from 14 to 98 years, with a median of 37 years. Two hundred and twenty-nine couples received couples counselling and testing; 87.8%, 4.8%, and 7.4% were concordant negative, concordant positive, and discordant, respectively. There were significant differences in characteristics between testers and non-testers as well as between male and female testers. The most common reasons for not testing were: not being ready/feeling scared/needing to think about it (34.1%); knowing his/her status (22.6%), being HIV-positive (18.5%), and not feeling at risk of having or acquiring HIV (10.1%). The distribution of reasons for refusal differed significantly by gender and age.ConclusionsThese findings indicate that HBHCT is acceptable in rural South Africa. However, future HBHCT programmes should carefully consider community context, develop strategies to reach a broad range of clients, and tailor intervention messages and services to meet the unique needs of different sub-groups. It will also be important to understand and address factors related to refusal of testing.

Appendix A: Baseline characteristics of women who do versus do not have 6-month post-childbirth outcome data for the primary endpoint analysis. Have 6-month outcome data for the primary endpoint analysis No (n=117) [1] Yes (n=453) p-value [2] Age, years (mean (SD)) 27 (5.1) 27 (4.7) 0.54 Marital status (n (%)) Married 117 (100%) 453 (100%) -Occupation (n (%)) Does not work Manual worker Non-manual worker 109 (93%) 6 (5%) 2 (2%) 424 (94%) 25 (6%) 4 (1%) 0.77 Education status (n (%)