Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex was performed in 10 normal subjects and 10 patients with radiographical abnormalities of the corpus callosum. Seven patients had a complete or partial agenesis or hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, two had a thin corpus callosum due to hydrocephalus or white matter degeneration and one had a circumscript contusion lesion of the corpus callosum. The patients served as a clinical model to investigate transcallosal influences on excitatory and inhibitory effects of motor cortex stimulation and to assess the potential diagnostic use of interhemispheric conduction studies and the contribution of interhemispheric interaction on transcranially elicited contralateral excitatory and inhibitory motor responses. Stimulation over one motor cortex suppressed tonic voluntary electromyographic activity in ipsilateral hand muscles in all subjects with preserved anterior half of the trunk of the corpus callosum. Since this suppression was lacking or had a delayed onset latency in patients with absence or abnormalities of the anterior half of the trunk of the corpus callosum it can be concluded that it is due to a transcallosal inhibition (Ti) of the opposite motor cortex mediated by fibres passing through this part of the corpus callosum. In normal subjects Ti had an mean onset latency of 36.1 +/- 3.5 ms (SD) and a duration of 24.5 +/- 3.9 ms. The calculated mean transcallosal conduction time was 13 ms. The threshold of Ti recorded in muscles ipsilateral to stimulation tended to be higher than the one for eliciting excitatory contralateral motor responses (56 +/- 6% versus 46 +/- 10% maximum stimulator output). Cortical thresholds (at rest) for contralateral excitatory hand motor responses were higher in patients with developmental abnormalities of the corpus callosum than in normals (66 +/- 17% versus 46 +/- 10% maximum stimulator output), which probably reflects also a facilitatory transcallosal interaction of both motor cortices in normals. In contrast, facilitation of cortically elicited motor responses in one hand by strong contraction of the other hand was the same in the patients with agenesis of the corpus callosum and normals, which suggests that this facilitatory spread takes place on a spinal rather than on a cortical level. Central motor latencies and amplitudes of contralateral hand motor responses were the same in patients with developmental abnormalities of the corpus callosum and normals (6.1 +/- 0.7 ms versus 6.3 +/- 0.7 ms and 6.7 +/- 2.4 mV versus 6.6 +/- 2.9 mV) so that callosal transfers do not seem to influence corticospinal conduction properties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Bimanual motor coordination is essential for piano playing. The functional neuronal substrate for high-level bimanual performance achieved by professional pianists is unclear. We compared professional pianists to musically naïve controls while carrying out in-phase (mirror) and anti-phase (parallel) bimanual sequential finger movements during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This task corresponds to bimanually playing scales practiced daily by pianists from the beginning of piano playing. Musicians and controls showed significantly different functional activation patterns. When comparing performance of parallel movements to rest, musically naïve controls showed stronger activations than did pianists within a network including anterior cingulate cortex, right dorsal premotor cortex, both cerebellar hemispheres, and right basal ganglia. The direct comparison of bimanual parallel to mirror movements between both groups revealed stronger signal increases in controls within mesial premotor cortex (SMA), bilateral cerebellar hemispheres and vermis, bilateral prefrontal cortex, left ventral premotor cortex, right anterior insula, and right basal ganglia. These findings suggest increased efficiency of cortical and subcortical systems for bimanual movement control in musicians. This may be fundamental to achieve high-level motor skills allowing the musician to focus on artistic aspects of musical performance.

Disturbances in recognizing facial expressions of disgust have been reported previously in pre-symptomatic and manifest Huntington's disease. Given the substantial role of the insula and basal ganglia in the perception of disgust as revealed by functional imaging, lesion studies and intracerebral recordings, we propose dysfunction within the insula and/or basal ganglia as the underlying neural substrate. Using functional MRI (fMRI), we studied a group of nine pre-symptomatic Huntington's disease gene carriers and nine healthy controls, matched for age, gender, intelligence and years of education, while they were viewing disgusted facial expressions. As control conditions, surprised and neutral expressions were presented. Compared with healthy controls, Huntington's disease gene carriers showed reduced responses within the left dorsal anterior insula during processing of disgusted facial expressions. Moreover, processing of disgust was associated with significant activation of the left dorsal anterior insula and putamen in healthy controls, but not in Huntington's disease gene carriers. Furthermore, behavioural assessment revealed a selective impairment in recognizing facial expressions displaying disgust in Huntington's disease gene carriers. Our finding of dysfunctional decreased insula activation in pre-symptomatic Huntington's disease provides an explanation for the clinical deficit in recognizing facial expression of disgust. Furthermore, it underscores the role of the insula in the emotion of disgust.

No abstract