The findings of this study indicate that allergen injection therapy with modified HDM extract is superior to placebo in allergic rhinitis therapy. The treatment was well tolerated and no serious drug-related AE were observed.

Immunotherapy with a modified slow-release birch pollen extract, administered in a single-strength preparation with a rapid dose increase, is safe and efficacious. IgG and IgG4 antibodies against native Bet v 1 are induced, which block basophil activation.

Nitrates decrease pulse pressure more than mean arterial pressure (MAP) and are advocated for the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). Nitrates show drug tolerance during chronic treatment so an asymmetric dosing regimen may prevent loss of effect of nitrates. This study investigates the anti-hypertensive effect of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) given in a twice daily asymmetric dosing regimen in elderly patients with ISH.After a 6-week placebo run-in period, patients entered the double-blind study. Ten patients received placebo and 11 patients ISDN 20 mg b.i.d. for 8 weeks. This dose could be doubled once. Office systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP/DBP) and ambulatory BP were measured. Pulse pressure was calculated as SBP-DBP.Office pulse pressure was more reduced during ISDN

BackgroundSUBLIVAC FIX Birch (SUB-B) is a liquid oral preparation of Betula verrucosa pollen extract for the treatment of allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjuctivitis induced by birch pollen. The major allergen content of SUB-B and Staloral Birch (Stal-B) have been shown to be comparable. In order to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of both products, the present study was designed to investigate efficacy of treatment with SUB-B compared to Stal-B by means of reduction in allergy symptoms assessed by a titrated nasal provocation test (TNPT) in subjects suffering from IgE mediated allergy complaints triggered by birch pollen.MethodsA prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE), controlled, single-centre study in 74 birch allergic adults was performed. Treatment consisted of either SUB-B (10,000 AUN/ml) or Stal-B (initial phase 10 I.R./ml and maintenance phase 300 I.R./ml) for 16–20 weeks at maintenance dose. The primary efficacy outcome was defined by the difference in change of the TNPT-threshold dose between the two treatment groups at baseline and after completion of treatment. Secondary outcomes included determination of birch pollen specific IgE and IgG levels, safety lab and ECG. During the first 30 days of treatment, subjects were requested to fill out a diary concerning compliance with study medication, occurrence of AEs and the use of concomitant medication.ResultsAnalysis of the primary efficacy parameter showed that the percentage of subjects showing a beneficial treatment effect was similar in both treatment groups, 33.3% for SUB-B vs. 31.4% for Stal-B in the intention to treat population. Evaluation of the immunologic response, showed that treatment with SUB-B and Stal-B induced similar increases (approximately 2 times) in IgE, IgG and IgG4 specific for Bet v 1.In total, 143 related adverse events (AEs) were reported. The majority of the AEs was of mild intensity. The same pattern of AEs was observed for both products. No clinically relevant changes in other safety parameters, such as safety laboratory parameters, vital signs, physical examination and ECGs were observed.ConclusionTaken together, treatment with both products was effective by means of reduction in allergic symptoms during a TNPT. In addition, safety analysis revealed a good tolerability of both SLIT extracts.

No abstract