To assess the use of eye care and its predictors among diabetic patients in Indonesia. Methods: Diabetic patients aged 18 years and older were recruited consecutively from a university clinic and 2 community clinics in Jakarta, Indonesia. Information obtained by questionnaire and record review included demographic and socioeconomic status, knowledge about diabetic retinopathy, and ocular and medical history. The main outcome was self-reported or record history of an eye examination by an eye care professional with dilation of the pupil within the preceding year. Results: Among 196 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.4 [9.4] years; 61.5% female), 166 (84.7%) had not undergone ocular examination in the last year, including 100 of 119 patients (84.0%) at the university clinic. Fewer than half (82 of 166 [49.4%]) of all patients reported being told of the need for eye examinations by their physician. In regression analyses, factors associated with having an eye examination were higher diabetic retinopathy knowledge score (odds ratio=1.52; P=.01) and years since being diagnosed as having diabetes (odds ratio=1.71 for third vs first tertile; P=.02). Education, income, health insurance status, and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy were not predictive of examination. The most common reasons given by subjects for not having had eye examinations concerned lack of knowledge about the need for care (97 of 160 subjects [60.6%]), while financial barriers were cited by only 22 of 160 subjects (13.8%). Conclusion: The low proportion of diabetic subjects receiving recommended annual eye examinations in Indonesia might be improved through patient and physician education.
PurposeTo estimate the total healthcare cost associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in type 2 diabetes in Indonesia and its projection for 2025.MethodsA prevalence-based cost-of-illness model was constructed from previous population-based DR study. Projection for 2025 was derived from estimated diabetes population in 2025. Direct treatment costs of DR were estimated from the perspective of healthcare. Patient perspective costs were obtained from thorough interview including only transportation cost and lost of working days related to treatment. We developed four cost-of-illness models according to DR severity level, DR without necessary treatment, needing laser treatment, laser +intravitreal (IVT) injection and laser + IVT +vitrectomy. All costs were estimated in 2017 US$.ResultsThe healthcare costs of DR in Indonesia were estimated to be $2.4 billion in 2017 and $8.9 billion in 2025. The total cost in 2017 consisted of the cost for no DR and mild–moderate non-proliferative DR (NPDR) requiring eye screening ($25.9 million), severe NPDR or proliferative DR (PDR) requiring laser treatment ($0.25 billion), severe NPDR or PDR requiring both laser and IVT injection ($1.75 billion) and advance level of PDR requiring vitrectomy ($0.44 billion).ConclusionsThe estimated healthcare cost of DR in Indonesia in 2017 was considerably high, nearly 2% of the 2017 national state budget, and projected to increase significantly to more than threefold in 2025. The highest cost may incur for DR requiring both laser and IVT injection. Therefore, public health intervention to delay or prevent severe DR may substantially reduce the healthcare cost of DR in Indonesia.
Background This case report describes two rare cases of Coats disease in nonjuvenile patients with preserved vision. Case presentation Two otherwise healthy Asian males aged 15 and 29 years old presented with unilateral gradual blurred vision and scotoma, respectively. Visual acuity was 6/6 (0 logMAR) with no other abnormalities observed in the anterior segment of the eyes. Both posterior segment examinations and fluorescein angiography revealed retinal telangiectatic vessels, exudation, and hemorrhage. Additionally, optical coherence tomography of the first patient showed subfoveal fluid. Both patients were diagnosed with stage 2 Coats disease. Laser photocoagulation was performed on both patients. The first patient showed initial good response to therapy with resolution of the subfoveal fluid; however, he developed cataract and underwent cataract surgery after 3 years. In the second case, although the exudates and hemorrhage still persisted, the macula was spared and the patient did not have visual complaints. No adverse events were reported, and final visual acuity of both patients remained 6/6. Conclusions Coats disease in adolescence and adulthood may present with good vision. In mild and moderate cases of Coats disease, laser photocoagulation monotherapy may help preserve vision. Nevertheless, as recurrences and complications may still occur later in life, lifelong monitoring is recommended.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.