BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEFlupirtine is a non-opioid analgesic that has been in clinical use for more than 20 years. It is characterized as a selective neuronal potassium channel opener (SNEPCO). Nevertheless, its mechanisms of action remain controversial and are the purpose of this study. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHEffects of flupirtine on native and recombinant voltage-and ligand-gated ion channels were explored in patch-clamp experiments using the following experimental systems: recombinant KIR3 and KV7 channels and a3b4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in tsA 201 cells; native voltage-gated Na, and TRPV1 channels, as well as GABAA, glycine, and ionotropic glutamate receptors expressed in rat dorsal root ganglion, dorsal horn and hippocampal neurons. KEY RESULTSTherapeutic flupirtine concentrations (Յ10 mM) did not affect voltage-gated Na + or Ca 2+ channels, inward rectifier K + channels, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, glycine or ionotropic glutamate receptors. Flupirtine shifted the gating of KV7 K + channels to more negative potentials and the gating of GABAA receptors to lower GABA concentrations. These latter effects were more pronounced in dorsal root ganglion and dorsal horn neurons than in hippocampal neurons. In dorsal root ganglion and dorsal horn neurons, the facilitatory effect of therapeutic flupirtine concentrations on KV7 channels and GABAA receptors was comparable, whereas in hippocampal neurons the effects on KV7 channels were more pronounced. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONSThese results indicate that flupirtine exerts its analgesic action by acting on both GABAA receptors and KV7 channels. AbbreviationsBMI, bicuculline methiodide; CNQX, cyano-2,3-dihydroxy-7-nitroquinoxaline; DRG, dorsal root ganglion; NBQX, 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide; SCG, superior cervical ganglion; SNEPCO, selective neuronal potassium channel opener
Phosphorylation of cortactin on S405 and S418 residues is required for its interaction with WAVE2 in monocyte chemotactic protein 1–induced cytoskeleton remodeling, facilitating human aortic smooth muscle cell migration.
Oxytocin (OT)- and vasopressin (VP)-secreting magnocellular neurons of the supraoptic nucleus (SON) display calcium-dependent afterhyperpolarizations (AHPs) following a train of action potentials that are critical to shaping the firing patterns of these cells. Previous work demonstrated that the lipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP ) enabled the slow AHP component (sAHP) in cortical pyramidal neurons. We investigated whether this phenomenon occurred in OT and VP neurons of the SON. Using whole cell recordings in coronal hypothalamic slices from adult female rats, we demonstrated that inhibition of PIP synthesis with wortmannin robustly blocked both the medium and slow AHP currents (I and I ) of OT, but not VP neurons with high affinity. We further tested this by introducing a water-soluble PIP analogue (diC -PIP ) into neurons, which in OT neurons not only prevented wortmannin's inhibitory effect, but slowed rundown of the I and I . Inhibition of phospholipase C (PLC) with U73122 did not inhibit either I or I in OT neurons, consistent with wortmannin's effects not being due to reducing diacylglycerol (DAG) or IP availability, i.e. PIP modulation of AHPs is not likely to involve downstream Ca release from inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP )-triggered Ca -store release, or channel modulation via DAG and protein kinase C (PKC). We found that wortmannin reduced [Ca ] increase induced by spike trains in OT neurons, but had no effect on AHPs evoked by uncaging intracellular Ca . Finally, wortmannin selectively reduced whole cell Ca currents in OT neurons while leaving VP neurons unaffected. The results indicate that PIP modulates both the I and I in OT neurons, most likely by controlling Ca entry through voltage-gated Ca channels opened during spike trains.
Most cells express more than one receptor plus degrading enzymes for adenine nucleotides or nucleosides, and cellular responses to purines are rarely compatible with the actions of single receptors. Therefore, these receptors are viewed as components of a combinatorial receptor web rather than self-dependent entities, but it remained unclear to what extent they can associate with each other to form signalling units. P2Y 1 , P2Y 2 , P2Y 12 , P2Y 13 , P2X 2 , A 1 , A 2A receptors and NTPDase1 and -2 were expressed as fluorescent fusion proteins which were targeted to membranes and signalled like the unlabelled counterparts. When tested by FRET microscopy, all the G protein-coupled receptors proved able to form heterooligomers with each other, and P2Y 1 , P2Y 13 , A 1 , A 2A , and P2X 2 receptors also formed homooligomers. P2Y receptors did not associate with P2X, but G protein-coupled receptors formed heterooligomers with NTPDase1, but not with NTPDase2. The specificity of prototypic interactions (P2Y 1 /P2Y 1 , A 2A / P2Y 1 , A 2A /P2Y 12 ) was corroborated by FRET competition or co-immunoprecipitation. These results demonstrate that G protein-coupled purine receptors associate with each other and with NTPDase1 in a highly promiscuous manner. Thus, purinergic signalling is not only determined by the expression of receptors and enzymes but also by their direct interaction within a previously unrecognized multifarious membrane network.
Most cells express more than one receptor plus degrading enzymes for adenine nucleotides or nucleosides, and cellular responses to purines are rarely compatible with the actions of single receptors. Therefore, these receptors are viewed as components of a combinatorial receptor web rather than self-dependent entities, but it remained unclear to what extent they can associate with each other to form signalling units. P2Y(1), P2Y(2), P2Y(12), P2Y(13), P2X(2), A(1), A(2A) receptors and NTPDase1 and -2 were expressed as fluorescent fusion proteins which were targeted to membranes and signalled like the unlabelled counterparts. When tested by FRET microscopy, all the G protein-coupled receptors proved able to form heterooligomers with each other, and P2Y(1), P2Y(12), P2Y(13), A(1), A(2A), and P2X(2) receptors also formed homooligomers. P2Y receptors did not associate with P2X, but G protein-coupled receptors formed heterooligomers with NTPDase1, but not NTPDase2. The specificity of prototypic interactions (P2Y(1)/P2Y(1), A(2A)/P2Y(1), A(2A)/P2Y(12)) was corroborated by FRET competition or co-immunoprecipitation. These results demonstrate that G protein-coupled purine receptors associate with each other and with NTPDase1 in a highly promiscuous manner. Thus, purinergic signalling is not only determined by the expression of receptors and enzymes but also by their direct interaction within a previously unrecognized multifarious membrane network.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.