Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could significantly reduce the number of unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies in about 50% of cases in which a PI-RADS score of 3 or greater is used. At the same time patients should be informed of the 16.2% and 39.7% false-negative rates of clinically significant prostate cancer for targeted fusion prostate biopsy of PI-RADS 3 or greater and 4 or greater lesions, respectively.
Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and other hypervascular liver lesions, such as hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), is important because of the drastically different therapeutic approach. However, FNH can be well distinguished only if it shows a typical aspect; alternatively, in the case of atypical FNH, imaging findings are not specific enough to provide a secure diagnosis and histologic verification of the lesion is required. In addition, HCA cannot be identified conclusively by any current available imaging technique and it can be at best suspected strongly, and this suspicion may lead to liver resection. Herein we report a case of a patient with an unusual FNH nodule presenting at ultrasonographic scanning as an isoechoic mass arising from hepatic segment 4b; the diagnostic indecision between FNH and HCA was not definitively solved even after computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging and the patient was scheduled for a laparoscopic resection. The pathologic examination diagnosed an atypical FNH nodule. The clinical doubt between FNH and HCA remains a problem affecting the clinicians, and more effort should be made in the direction of a better preoperative differentiation of such different conditions. Surgical resection should not be considered as the failure of the preoperative diagnostic attempt, but as the mainstay for a definitive and sure diagnosis.
Multiparametric MRI/TRUS TP in comparison to TR fusion biopsy detected a greater percentage of small but clinically significant PCa of the anterior zone (86.7% vs. 46.7%; p=0.0001).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.