We studied the visual field distribution of speed and accuracy of manual responses to small brief light flashes, in patients with left hemineglect or extinction resulting from right hemisphere vascular lesions and in brain-damaged and healthy control subjects. All patients with right hemisphere lesions showed a greater impairment in both the speed of response and the detection rate in the contralesional than in the ipsilesional hemifield. This interfield difference increased with the eccentricity of stimulus presentation and was especially pronounced in neglect patients who showed a paradoxical increase in speed of response and detection rate at increasingly larger eccentricities in the ipsilesional hemifield. We hypothesize that both the contralesional slowing down and the ipsilesional speeding up of the response depends upon an exaggerated gradient of attention towards the ipsilesional hemifield. To assess whether these abnormalities concern automatic or controlled attentional processes, in a second experiment, we manipulated the predictability of the side of the stimulus presentation by using blocked rather than randomized stimulus presentations. This resulted in a speeding up of responses in both hemifields thus showing that the patients were able to focus attention to the side of stimulus presentation voluntarily. However, there was no modification of the contra-ipsilesional differences which, therefore, are likely to be related to abnormal automatic processes rather than controlled attention.

No abstract

Background and Purpose: Acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion can be concurrent with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion in patients with COVID-19 are substantially unknown. Our aim was to study early outcomes after MT in patients with COVID-19. Methods: Multicenter, European, cohort study involving 34 stroke centers in France, Italy, Spain, and Belgium. Data were collected between March 1, 2020 and May 5, 2020. Consecutive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases with large vessel occlusion, who were treated with MT, were included. Primary investigated outcome: 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes: early neurological improvement (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement ≥8 points or 24 hours National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 0–1), successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade ≥2b), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Results: We evaluated 93 patients with COVID-19 with large vessel occlusion who underwent MT (median age, 71 years [interquartile range, 59–79]; 63 men [67.7%]). Median pretreatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography score were 17 (interquartile range, 11–21) and 8 (interquartile range, 7–9), respectively. Anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke represented 93.5% of cases. The rate modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b to 3 was 79.6% (74 patients [95% CI, 71.3–87.8]). Thirty-day mortality was 29% (27 patients [95% CI, 20–39.4]). Early neurological improvement was 19.5% (17 patients [95% CI, 11.8–29.5]), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 5.4% (5 patients [95% CI, 1.7–12.1]). Patients who died at 30 days exhibited significantly lower lymphocyte count, higher levels of aspartate, and LDH (lactate dehydrogenase). After adjustment for age, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography score, and successful reperfusion, these biological markers remained associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio of 2.70 [95% CI, 1.21–5.98] per SD-log decrease in lymphocyte count, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.22–5.77] per SD-log increase in aspartate, and 4.30 [95% CI, 1.43–12.91] per SD-log increase in LDH). Conclusions: The 29% rate of 30-day mortality after MT among patients with COVID-19 is not negligible. Abnormalities of lymphocyte count, LDH and aspartate may depict a patient’s profiles with poorer outcomes after MT. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04406090.

We used qualitative visual assessment and semiquantitative measures of striatal DAT binding using [(123)I]FP-CIT-SPET in 85 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We compared these two assessments and their correlation with PD clinical progression. SPET imaging was visually classified by a nuclear medicine physician as normal or abnormal pattern grade I, II and III, in relation to a different degree of radioligand reduction uptake. Nineteen patients presented abnormal grade I (group 1), 53 grade II (group 2) and 13 grade III (group 3). The UPDRS III motor score, the H-Y score, the rigidity and bradykinesia subscores were significantly different among the three groups. Post hoc analysis showed that all values of these clinical parameters were higher in group 3 than in 2 and 1. All clinical indices were also significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1. This means that groups 3 and 2 were clinically more severely affected. No significant differences among the 3 groups were observed for age or duration of disease. Values of the mean striatum uptake were also significantly different among the three groups. Post hoc analysis revealed significantly lower values of the mean striatum uptake in group 3 with respect to groups 2 and 1; values were also significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1. We conclude that our findings of good consistency between visual and semi-quantitative assessment may help simplify the evaluation of striatal DAT binding in PD in a clinical routine setting.

No abstract