This study tested a family-based skills-building intervention in veterans with chronic combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Veterans and a family member were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) waiting list, (b) 18 sessions of twice-weekly exposure therapy, or (c) 18 sessions of twice-weekly exposure therapy followed by 16 sessions of behavioral family therapy (BFT). Participation in exposure therapy reduced PTSD positive symptoms (e.g., reexperiencing and hyperarousal) but not PTSD negative symptoms. Positive symptom gains were maintained at 6-month follow-up. However, participation in BFT had no additional impact on PTSD symptoms.

Sociocultural factors affect responses to different types of intervention. The results did not support earlier findings of a beneficial effect of BFM when applied to a socioculturally diverse population.

We investigated work adjustment among 41 recently exacerbated patients witb> schizophrenia who were randomly assigned to receive either customary care alone or behavioral family therapy (BFT) and customary care. At baseline, most patients were unemployed and evidenced poor work adjustment. Negative schizophrenic symptoms were more strongly associated with current work dysfunction than were indices of other psychopathology. At one year, significantly fewer patients participating in BFT had evidenced psychotic exacerbations. However, vocational adjustment in both groups was still poor, with few benefits of BFT on work functioning noted.As a result of the deinstitutionalization movement, most individuals with schizophrenia now rely heavily on their families for financial support, emotional sustenance, and guidance in daily living (Creer & Wing, 1974;McFarlane, 1983) Not surprisingly, the burden of caring for an adult relative who requires supervision and whose behavior may be chaotic, incomprehensible, or hostile often results in extreme family distress (Hatfield, 1979;Johnson, 1990). The recognition that families serve a vital role in supporting the rehabilitation of persons with serious psychiatric illnesses, although they may experience extreme stress in undertaking this endeavor, spurred enthusiasm for providing both the patient and his/her relatives treatment to maximize reintegration into the community.A series of well-controlled investigations utilizing random assignment of rigorously diagnosed subjects with a recent symptom exacerbation to carefully developed and reliably conducted treatment interventions has established that family-based interventions can have a significant, positive impact on many patients with schizophrenia (

The relationship of a full range of psychiatric symptoms to EE was examined in 40 men with BPRS and SANS diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Patients from high-EE families had significantly higher ratings of positive symptoms, anxious depression, and overall psychopathology, but not negative symptoms, than did those from low-EE families. In predicting relapses of schizophrenia, account may need to be taken of an interaction between subtle differences in symptoms and relatives' attitudes.

While flooding or direct therapeutic exposure (DTE) has been empirically validated as an effective primary treatment for PTSD through several randomized controlled trials, there is also evidence that relatively few trauma therapists actually use the technique. There are now several published reports which document a number of the difficulties in implementing the treatment with chronic PTSD patients. These problems, ranging from patient refusal to adverse reactions, represent several domains, including trauma history characteristics, patients' personal characteristics, therapist factors, and treatment environment factors. The purpose of the present report is to provide an empirical rationale to support the use of individual flooding as a primary form of psychotherapy for chronic combat‐related PTSD. Implementation rates for flooding are compared among expert behavioural trauma therapists versus field use rates for trauma programmes generally. Complications or side‐effects of flooding are considered. We also identify several predictable sources of difficulty in implementing individual flooding and the proportions of patients likely to be affected by each type. Finally, practical suggestions are offered for improving utilization of flooding, and directions for future empirical investigations are explored.