No abstract

Summary Background (ECT) is an effective local treatment for cutaneous metastasis. Treatment involves the administration of chemotherapeutic drugs followed by delivery of electrical pulses to the tumour. Objectives To investigate the effectiveness of ECT in cutaneous metastases of melanoma and to identify factors that affect (beneficially or adversely) the outcome. Methods Thirteen cancer centres in the International Network for Sharing Practices on Electrochemotherapy consecutively and prospectively uploaded data to a common database. ECT consisted of intratumoral or intravenous injection of bleomycin, followed by application of electric pulses under local or general anaesthesia. Results In total, 151 patients with metastatic melanoma were identified from the database, 114 of whom had follow‐up data of 60 days or more. Eighty‐four of these patients (74%) experienced an overall response (OR = complete response + partial response). Overall, 394 lesions were treated, of which 306 (78%) showed OR, with 229 showing complete response (58%). In multivariate analysis, factors positively associated with overall response were coverage of deep margins, absence of visceral metastases, presence of lymphoedema and treatment of nonirradiated areas. Factors significantly associated with complete response to ECT treatment were coverage of deep margins, previous irradiation of the treated area and tumour size (< 3 cm). One‐year overall survival in this cohort of patients was 67% (95% confidence interval 57–77%), while melanoma‐specific survival was 74% (95% confidence interval 64–84%). No serious adverse events were reported, and the treatment was in general very well tolerated. Conclusions ECT is a highly effective local treatment for melanoma metastases in the skin, with no severe adverse effects noted in this study. In the presence of certain clinical factors, ECT may be considered for local tumour control as an alternative to established local treatments, or as an adjunct to systemic treatments.

Multidetector computed tomography (CT) offers new opportunities in imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. When thin collimation is used, near-isotropic imaging of the stomach is possible, allowing high-quality multiplanar reformation and three-dimensional reconstruction of gastric images. Proper distention of the stomach and optimally timed administration of intravenous contrast material are required to detect and characterize disease. In contrast to gastroscopy and double-contrast studies of the stomach, CT provides information about both the gastric wall and the extragastric extent of disease. Preoperative staging of gastric carcinoma appears to be the main clinical indication for multidetector CT. In addition, multidetector CT allows detection of other gastric malignancies (lymphoma, carcinoid tumors, metastases, gastrointestinal stromal tumors) and benign gastric tumors (neural tumors, polyps). Gastric inflammation (gastritis, ulcers, Ménétrier disease) and miscellaneous gastric conditions (emphysema, gastric outlet obstruction, varices) can also be visualized with multidetector CT. Multidetector CT is a valuable tool for the evaluation of gastric wall disease and serves as an adjunct to endoscopy.

High-spatial-resolution US is a reliable diagnostic tool for the evaluation of occult scaphoid fractures and should be considered an adequate alternative diagnostic tool prior to computed tomography or MR imaging.

The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively the diagnostic yield of anal endosonography (AES) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of perianal fistulae and abscesses. There were 39 patients (14 men, 25 women; mean age, 40 years) who underwent AES, performed with a 10-MHz rotating endoanal probe and MRI at 1.0 T (axial and coronal T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) and turbo-STIR sequences). Fistulae were classified as subcutaneous, intersphincteric, transsphincteric, high (i.e., high extrasphincteric or suprasphincteric), rectovaginal, and horseshoe and were compared with the surgical findings in all patients. Overall, 58 fistulae (subcutaneous, N ‫؍‬ 7; intersphincteric, N ‫؍‬ 9; transsphincteric, N ‫؍‬ 16; high, N ‫؍‬ 17; rectovaginal, N ‫؍‬ 5; and horseshoe, N ‫؍‬ 4) were detected at surgery. MRI showed a sensitivity of 84% and AES of 60% (P < .05). False-positive diagnoses were made in 6 patients (15%) with MRI and in 15 patients (26%) with AES, for a specificity of 68% and 21%, respectively (P < .05). Our findings show that MRI is superior to AES in the assessment of fistula-in-ano before major surgery. AES should be used only for orientation before minor procedures, such as incision or drainage of subcutaneous fistulae.