Substantial amounts of tooth minerals are lost during dental caries formation. Transversal microradiography, a well-accepted method used to quantify mineral loss, is a time-consuming technique which requires a thin enamel section (100 µm) and involves the use of x-rays. In an attempt to solve these difficulties, a procedure has been developed in which a human tooth specimen with demineralized enamel is cut in half (HT), stained with a fluorescent dye (rhodamine B) and analyzed using a laser scanning confocal microscope. A series of three studies was conducted to correlate measurements of enamel demineralization obtained from enamel thin (100 µm) sections (TS) using transversal microradiography with three parameters (area of the lesion; total and average dye fluorescence intensities) measured on the same TS or on a thicker section (HT) of the same specimen by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Results showed that a 0.1 mM rhodamine B solution provided the most adequate imaging conditions for confocal microscopy. Pearson’s correlation coefficients, calculated between microradiography and confocal microscopy data obtained using a 0.1 mM rhodamine B solution, were: ΔZ vs. HT lesion area = 0.95; ΔZ vs. HT total fluorescence = 0.80; ΔZ vs. HT average fluorescence = 0.74; ΔZ vs. TS lesion area = 0.95; ΔZ vs. TS total fluorescence = 0.74; ΔZ vs. TS average fluorescence = 0.55. All these correlations coefficients were statistically significant (p < 0.01). It is concluded that in enamel demineralization studies statistically significant correlations exist between parameters measured using transversal microradiography and parameters quantified using confocal microscopy.
Tooth minerals are lost and regained constantly in a normal, human oral environment. Different methods have been developed to measure this gain and loss in enamel minerals; however, these methods deal with different problems, such as being time consuming or involving the use of X–rays. The aim of this study was to determine if remineralization measured in a thin enamel section (TS) by transversal microradiography (MR) can be reliably monitored by measuring lesion parameters (area, total and average dye fluorescence) on the same TS or on half a tooth (HT) with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Thirty–six human enamel specimens were demineralized for 96h, and then half of each specimen was covered with an acid–resistant nail varnish. Specimens were divided into three groups (12/group) and subjected for 20 days to a cyclic remineralization regimen with consisted daily of a 4–hour acid challenge, four 1–min treatment periods with 0, 250 or 1,100 ppm F dentifrice slurries (1:2; dentifrice:water) and 20 h in pooled, human saliva, at room temperature. Specimens were cut and analyzed by MR, then stained with a fluorescent dye (0.1mM rhodamine B) for 1 h and analyzed using CLSM. Both MR and CLSM detected significantly greater remineralization (p<0.05) in the specimens treated with the fluoride–containing dentifrices than in the specimens treated with 0 ppm F. Significant differences were detected between specimens treated witht the fluoride–containing dentifrices by MR and CLSM (HT area and total fluorescence). Statistically significant (p<0.05) Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the MR and CLSM data: difference in MR mineral content (ΔM) versus HT lesion area = 0.71; ΔM versus HT total fluorescence = 0.70; ΔM versus HT average fluorescence = 0.61; ΔM versus TS lesion area = 0.88; ΔM versus TS total fluorescence = 0.63, and ΔM versus TS average fluorescence = 0.40. It is concluded that confocal microscopy in either TS or HT may provide valid surrogates (area and total fluorescence) for MR measurements in enamel remineralization studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.