Backround The supraclavicular plexus block (SCB) and interscalene plexus block (ISB) have the potential to pulmonary function, the duration of the potential remains uncertain. So, we compared the effect of SCB and ISB on pulmonary function, especially the duration time. Methods Ninety-six patients were finally allocated to group I and group S. The ISB and the SCB procedures were performed with ultrasound guidance before anesthesia induction. An investigator recorded the diaphragm mobility and respiratory function test indicators before the block (T0) and at 30 min (T30 min), 4 h (T4), 8 h (T8), and 12 h (T12) after the block. The diaphragmatic paralysis rate was calculated for above timepoint. The VAS, the recovery time for the sensory and motor block, and adverse reactions within 24 h of administering the block were also recorded. Results The recovery times of diaphragm mobility in group I were longer than those in group S. Compared with group I, group S had a significantly lower diaphragmatic paralysis rate during eupnea breathing at T30 min and T8 after the block. Similarly, group S had a significantly lower diaphragmatic paralysis rate at deep breathing at T30 min, T8, and T12 after the block. The recovery times of FEV1 and FVC in group I were longer than those in group S. The other results were not statistically significant. Conclusions Ultrasound-guided ISB resulted in a longer periods with a suppressive effect on pulmonary function than SCB. Trials registration 17/12/2019, ChiCTR1900028286.
BACKGROUND: The supraclavicular plexus block (SPB) and interscalene plexus block (IPB) have the potential to pulmonary function, the duration of the potential remains uncertain. So, we compared the effect of SPB and IPB on pulmonary function, especially the duration time. METHODSː Ninety-eight patients were randomly allocated to group I and group S. The IPB and the SPB procedures were performed with ultrasound guidance before anesthesia induction. An investigator recorded the diaphragm mobility and respiratory function test indicators before the block (T0) and at 30 min (T30 min), 4 h (T4), 8 h (T8), and 12 h (T12) after the block. The diaphragmatic paralysis rate was calculated for above timepoint. The VAS, the recovery time for the sensory and motor block, and adverse reactions within 24 hours of administering the block were also recorded. RESULTSː The recovery times of diaphragm mobility in group I were longer than those in group S. Compared with group I, group S had a significantly lower diaphragmatic paralysis rate during eupnea breathing at T30 min, and T8 after the block. Similarly, group S had a significantly lower diaphragmatic paralysis rate at deep breathing at T30 min, T8 and T12 after the block. The recovery times of FEV1 and FVC in group I were longer than those in group S. The other results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONSː Ultrasound-guided IPB resulted in a longer periods with a suppressive effect on pulmonary function than SPB. Clinical Trials Registration:17/12/2019, ChiCTR1900028286
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.