Presently several evidences support an association between acute myocardial infarction and influenza infection. The pathophysiology rationale rests on the release of inflammation cytokines, rupture of atherosclerotic plaque, and triggering of prothrombotic events leading to coronary artery occlusion. Several observational evidences support a potential role of influenza vaccine in cardiovascular prevention. It is estimated that the efficacy of influenza vaccine in preventing myocardial infarction could range between 15% and 45%. Notwithstanding the clear recommendation of numerous guidelines concerning patients with cardiovascular diseases, vaccination rates are still low in the high-risk groups. Influenza vaccine as preventive measure of cardiovascular disease still awaits support from randomized clinical trials. Nonetheless, considering the favourable cost-efficacy and safety profile of influenza vaccination, its use should be encouraged in everyday clinical practice.

Nitric oxide donors have been commonly used in the therapy of cardiovascular disease for more than 150 years. In spite of this longevity and the popularity of their use, it appears somewhat paradoxical that there is no current consistent use among cardiologists, as to both their indications and their optimal mode of administration. In part this results from their contradictory pharmacodynamics: when given acutely, their effectiveness is undisputable; however, their long-term efficacy is potentially limited by the development of tolerance and the induction of endothelial dysfunction, which may have negative prognostic implications. This review reports recent biochemical and pathophysiological acquisitions, re-examines the role of nitrates and other nitric oxide donors in cardiovascular medicine, comparing and commenting on international guidelines; and highlights areas of uncertainty, where more clinical research with these drugs would still be warranted.

Haemostasis and thrombosis are closely linked, so that any anticoagulant strategy available today that reduces the thrombotic risk inevitably increases the bleeding risk. However, epidemiological and experimental evidence suggests that inhibiting the contact pathway—the first phase of the intrinsic coagulation pathway—and especially factor XI (FXI) achieves the objective of preventing thrombosis with minimal interference on the haemostatic process. Several pharmacological strategies that act by inhibiting FXI are being studied in clinical trials. Specifically, Phase 2 clinical trials in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, end-stage renal disease, atrial fibrillation (AF), and acute coronary syndrome have shown promising results, allowing clinical research to advance into Phase 3 clinical trials. FXI inhibitors will not necessarily replace currently available direct oral anticoagulants: this would appear too ambitious as of today. However, it is possible to hypothesize that FXI inhibitors are a useful addition to our therapeutic armamentarium in contexts where current anticoagulants have failed or have not been adequately tested, as well as in categories of patients who are at a high risk of bleeding even with current direct oral anticoagulants.

The most recent high-sensitivity assays for troponins I and T (hs-TnI and hs-TnT) have made it possible to detect blood concentrations up to 10 times lower than previous assays, making troponins detectable even in asymptomatic subjects without manifest cardiovascular disease. For this reason, hs-Tn, initially introduced as markers of myocardial damage in an acute setting, have also become possible markers of subclinical myocardial damage in baseline conditions. In fact, recent evidence suggests that hs-TnT and hs-TnI predict the risk of future cardiovascular events also in the context of primary prevention, and offer incremental information when added to current risk stratification models. The different association highlighted with different outcome measures, such as coronary heart disease, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and death from all causes, seems to indicate that the risk observed in asymptomatic subjects with high levels of hs-Tn is an expression of subclinical damage secondary to multiple pathophysiological mechanisms, and not only to atherothrombosis. However, the ability of hs-TnT and hs-TnI (until now used interchangeably), to provide differential predictive information, and not redundant with respect to more traditional factors, remains to be definitively clarified, both for the purpose of predicting specific outcomes and for the implementation of specific preventive strategies. To date, evidences available allow us to hypothesize their role more as markers than as risk factors.