SummaryIn an attempt to reduce the incidence of pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism (PA-VTE), some researchers have advocated screening of all women for the factor VLeiden mutation during early pregnancy. We have conducted a large retrospective study (over 72,000 deliveries) to determine if this would be useful. Sixty-two objectively confirmed venous thrombotic events (51 DVT, 11 PE) were recorded at two maternity units in the UK. The incidence of DVT was 0.71 per 1000 deliveries (95% CI 0.5-0.9) with 0.50 occurring in the antenatal period (95% CI 0.34-0.66) and 0.21 in the puerperium (95% CI 0.11-0.31). The incidence of PE was 0.15 per 1000 deliveries (95% CI 0.06-0.24), 0.07 antenatal (95% CI 0.01-0.13) and 0.08 in the puerperium (95% CI 0.02-0.14). Of these 62,50 attended for follow-up and thrombophilia screening. 28% of all episodes of PA-VTE had no CIinical risk factor for thrombosis or an identifiable thrombophilic abnormality. Deficiency of antithrombin was identified in 12% of individuals (95% CI 3-21) and the factor VLeiden mutation in 8% (95% CI 0.5-15.5). Based on estimates of the prevalence of the factor VLeiden mutation in the population, we estimate that the thrombotic risk for a woman during pregnancy or the puerperium with the defect is approximately 1 in 400-500. This figure would not lend support to the idea of random screening for the mutation in early pregnancy.

In a cohort of 9669 blood donors we have identified 16 cases of congenital AT deficiency (1 in 600) by way of family studies and AT gene analysis. Two donors had type I AT deficiency (prevalence 0.21 per 1000; 95% CI = 0.03/1000 to 0.75/1000), their families displaying a symptomatic phenotype. 14 donors had a type II deficiency (prevalence 1.45 per 1000; 95% CI = 0.79/1000 to 2.43/1000): one recurring and three unique mutations. None of these type II deficiencies appeared to confer a high thrombotic risk despite many of the affected individuals having experienced potentially prothrombotic challenges. The high frequency of these relatively asymptomatic variants may reflect a selection bias in the study population. However, their existence should not only add to our understanding of structure-function relationships of AT but may also influence our management of asymptomatic deficient individuals identified in epidemiological or presurgical screening programmes.

SummaryReported prevalence rates for protein C (PC) deficiency in the population at large have varied widely. The differences presumably reflect the existence of an apparently high number of clinically recessive forms of the deficiency. In an attempt to document more precisely the prevalence of PC deficiency in the healthy population we have measured PC activity in just under 10,000 blood donors in the West of Scotland. After repeat testing of donors with low results and then further observation and selection, 32 donors were identified who had individual mean PC activities below the age- and gender-specific study reference range. Assessment of available first degree relatives, and also PC gene analysis in 23 of these donors, allowed identification of at least 14 with an inheritable deficiency (8 by both family study and gene analysis, 3 by family study alone and 3 by gene analysis alone). Two recurring and seven unique point mutations, only one of which has been previously described, were identified. The observed prevalence of inherited PC deficiency was 1.45 per 1000 (95% Cl, 0.79/1000 to 2.43/1000). However after correcting for the possibility of missing some genuine inherited deficiencies we estimated the prevalence to be as high as 1 in 500. All cases of hereditary deficiency were asymptomatic with regard to thrombosis and none had a strong family history of thrombosis. These findings confirm the rather frequent occurrence of asymptomatic individuals with PC deficiency and support the hypothesis that additional defects in the anticoagulant pathways may be required to confer a high-thrombotic-risk phenotype.

SummaryInterpretation of protein C (PC) levels in a given individual has several limitations. A normal PC activity does not necessarily exclude a genetic deficiency nor can a reduced level confirm it. Measuring PC amidolytic activity in 9,648 healthy blood donors has allowed identification of demographic factors which cause variation in PC activity and further hinder interpretation. PC activity displays a log normal distribution and significant variation with age. This is most marked in young adult males when mean PC activity rises from 0.86 iu/ml (15–19 years) to 1.04 iu/ml (45–49 years; P <0.0001). Pre-menopausal females, who for most age ranges, have mean PC activity below their male contemporaries, show a less marked rise with age until the menopause when PC activity rises further. The use of hormonal contraceptive preparations is associated with an increase in mean PC activity of 0.05–0.08 iu/ml while smoking habit has no influence on PC activity.In view of these findings we strongly recommend the use of age and sex restricted reference ranges when interpreting PC activity.

SummaryDespite many reports of individuals with congenital plasminogen deficiency and thrombosis, there is still uncertainty whether heterozygous deficiency represents a real thrombophilic risk factor or simply a coincidental finding. We have addressed this issue by testing for plasminogen deficiency in a cohort of 9611 blood donors. Out of 66 donors with reduced plasminogen activity on two occasions 28 were shown to have a familial deficiency state (including 3 with dysplasminogen-aemia). Our observed prevalence rate for familial plasminogen deficiency, calculated at 2.9/1000 (95% Cl = 1.9-4.2 per 1000), was not significantly different from that calculated from published reports of congenital plasminogen deficiency in thrombotic cohorts (5.4/1000). Furthermore, with only two exceptions, all 80 donors and relatives with familial deficiency were asymptomatic with regard to thrombosis -including a 29 year old donor with suspected compound heterozygous hypoplasminogenaemia. These findings add further weight to the argument that familial heterozygous plasminogen deficiency, at least in isolation, does not constitute a significant thrombotic risk factor. However, it remains uncertain whether plasminogen deficiency, when combined with other thrombophilic conditions, may become more clinically important.