SummaryThe management of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in India remains a challenge. In a two‐year prospective study at our centre there were 380 newly diagnosed AML (excluding acute promyelocytic leukaemia, AML‐M3) patients. The median age of newly diagnosed patients was 40 years (range: 1–79; 12·3% were ≤ 15 years, 16·3% were ≥ 60 years old) and there were 244 (64·2%) males. The median duration of symptoms prior to first presentation at our hospital was 4 weeks (range: 1–52). The median distance from home to hospital was 580 km (range: 6–3200 km). 109 (29%) opted for standard of care and were admitted for induction chemotherapy. Of the 271 that did not take treatment the major reason was lack of financial resources in 219 (81%). There were 27 (24·7%) inductions deaths and of these, 12 (44·5%) were due to multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative bacilli and 12 (44·5%) showed evidence of a fungal infection. The overall survival at 1 year was 70·4% ± 10·7%, 55·6% ± 6·8% and 42·4% ± 15·6% in patients aged ≤15 years, 15 ‐ 60 years and ≥60 years, respectively. In conclusion, the biggest constraint is the cost of treatment and the absence of a health security net to treat all patients with this diagnosis.

Glanzmann's thrombasthenia is a rare platelet function disorder with an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance. Achieving haemostasis in such patients who undergo surgical procedures always poses a significant challenge. Herein we report six cases of Glanzmann's thrombasthenia, who underwent nine surgeries under the cover of platelet-rich concentrates with or without recombinant activated factor VII . Of these, five were major surgeries such as thyroidectomy, laparotomy, Hartmann's procedure, reversal of Hartmann's procedure and a complete dental extraction. All five procedures were successfully done without any major bleeding. The major cost incurred in these procedures is due to the large number of blood products used and recombinant activated factor VII if used.

The incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFI) is believed to be higher in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) undergoing chemotherapy in non-HEPA-filtered rooms. The aim of this study is to review the incidence of IFI in a large cohort of patients with AML treated at a single centre in India. Two hundred and twenty-two patients with AML treated with either induction chemotherapy or salvage chemotherapy between 2008 and 2013 were studied retrospectively. IFI was defined as per the revised EORTC-MSG criteria. Data on type of chemotherapy, prophylactic strategies, engraftment (ANC>500), the presence of IFI and survival were collected. IFI was diagnosed in 86 patients (38.7%) with proven IFI in 12 (5.4%). Use of posaconazole prophylaxis (P=.001) was the only factor associated with reduced incidence of IFI. Survival in patients with proven IFI was lower than those without proven IFI, but not statistically significant (59.4% vs 78.5%; P=.139). There is a high incidence of IFI during induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia in developing countries. Posaconazole prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower incidence of IFI. Optimal yet cost-effective strategies for prevention and early diagnosis of IFI are required to improve survival in patients undergoing chemotherapy for AML.

Background:With the increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms and high mortality rates associated with these infections, we describe the spectrum of the major drug-resistant pathogens identified in fecal surveillance, and re-visit the use of fecal surveillance in predicting infection with these organisms post-allogeneic stem cell transplant. Methods: Data from allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with common drugresistant strains of bacteria in fecal surveillance (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterococcus spp.) were compared with recipients who did not have the same in fecal surveillance cultures. Baseline characteristics and post-transplant outcomes including similar drug resistance in blood cultures, severe sepsis, and 100-day transplantrelated mortality were compared. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression model was used to determine independent predictors of outcome.Results: In 232 transplants, the prevalence of common drug-resistant isolates in fecal surveillance cultures was 57.7% (134 out of 232 patients-with a single isolate in 115 and ≥2 isolates in the remaining 19 patients. A total of 164 drug-resistant isolates were obtained from 134 patients. Of the 164 isolates, 133 (81%) were positive for ESBL screening, 19 (11.5%) for carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) screening, 12 (7.3%) for VRE screening. Patients who had common drug-resistant pathogens detected in fecal surveillance have significantly higher subsequent blood culture positivity with drug resistance, as well as higher 100-day mortality. Factors influencing 100-day mortality included patient's age (P = .001), drug resistance positivity in blood (P < .001), drug resistance in fecal surveillance (P = .011), use of an alternate donor (other than fully matched sibling) (P < .001), GVHD grade 3-4 (P < .001), and severe sepsis (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, only use of an alternate donor (0.024), severe sepsis (P < .001), and grade 3-4 GVHD (P < .001) retained significance in predicting 100-day mortality.

Background Studies have shown that the incidence of inhibitor development varies between FVIII concentrates, with some suggesting that recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates produced in hamster cell lines pose a greater risk of inhibitor development than plasma-derived (pd) von Willebrand factor (VWF)-containing FVIII (pdFVIII/VWF) products. In the SIPPET study, the cumulative incidence of high-titer inhibitorswith hamster-cell derived rFVIII products was 28.4% vs 18.6% for pdFVIII/VWF (Peyvandi F et al. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2054-2064). These studies did not include new generation rFVIII products produced in human cell lines. Nuwiq® (Human-cl rFVIII) is the first and only new-generation rFVIII produced in human cells without chemical modification or protein fusion. The pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® have been examined in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A, and no inhibitors have been reported in 201 PTPs. The immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A is currently being assessed in the ongoing NuProtect study. Methods The NuProtect study was initiated in 2013 and is being conducted in 17 countries and 38 centers worldwide. One hundred evaluable (110 enrolled) male PUPs of all ages and ethnicities are being studied for 100 exposure days (EDs) or a maximum study participation of 5 years. The patients were to have received no treatment with FVIII concentrates or other blood products containing FVIII prior to study entry. The primary objective of the NuProtect study is to assess the immunogenicity of Nuwiq® by determining inhibitor activity (≥0.6 BU) using the Nijmegen modified Bethesda assay in a central laboratory. Intensive screening for inhibitors is scheduled every 3-4 EDs until 20 EDs, then every 10-12 EDs until 100 EDs, and every 3 months until study completion. Secondary endpoints include assessment of hemostatic efficacy in prophylaxis, in the treatment of bleeds and in surgical prophylaxis, as well as safety and tolerability. All patients undergo F8 gene mutation analysis. Results Data from 85 treated PUPs have been included in the first pre-planned interim analysis (May 2016) of which 66 PUPs had ≥20 EDs (by which time the majority of inhibitors are likely to have arisen). The median age at first treatment was 13 months (range: 3-135). Of the 59 patients with available F8 gene mutation analysis, 1 (1.7%) had no identifiable mutation, 44 (74.6%) had mutations conferring a high risk of inhibitor development and 47 (81.0%) had null mutations. Data analysis in May 2016 showed that only 8 of the 66 PUPs treated with Nuwiq® for ≥20 EDs had developed a high-titer inhibitor after a median of 11.5 EDs (range 6-24). Five of the 66 PUPs developed a low-titer inhibitor, 4 (80%) of which were transient. Only 2 patients developed an inhibitor (1 high-titer) after 20 EDs. The cumulative incidence of high-titer inhibitors in PUPs treated with Nuwiq® is 12.8% (95% CI: 4.49-21.15) (Figure 1). The cumulative incidence of low-titer inhibitors was 8.4% (95% CI: 1.28-15.59) and of all inhibitors was 20.8% (95% CI: 10.68-30.95). No patient developed an inhibitor after 25 EDs. The incidence has remained consistent since the start of the study in 2013. Twelve of 13 patients who developed inhibitors had the causative F8 gene mutation detected, all of which were null, and all but one were high-risk. Conclusions PUPs treated with Nuwiq® for ≥20 EDs had 12.8% cumulative incidence of high-titer inhibitorsat the time of interim analysis (8 of 66 PUPs) despite the fact that 81% of patients had gene mutations known to be associated with increased inhibitor risk (e.g. null mutations). These interim data support the low rate of inhibitor development in PUPs treated with Nuwiq® - a human-cell derived (not chemically modified or protein fused) recombinant FVIII. Final data from the NuProtect study are expected in 2018 and will provide further insights into the development of inhibitors in PUPs with severe hemophilia A. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of inhibitor development Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of inhibitor development Disclosures Liesner: CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SOBI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BPL: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cangene: Research Funding; Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now a part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria. Altisent:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy. Belletrutti:Shire Pharmaceuticals (formerly Baxalta): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Other: Travel support. Borel-Derlon:LFB: Other: Reference expert and national coordinator for VWD; Shire - Baxalta: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Other: Expert for scientific committee. Ducore:CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LFB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharama: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta (Shire): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sigaud:Shire - Baxalta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.