Background: Plasma NT-proBNP levels are sensitive markers of ventricular dysfunction. However, studies of natriuretic peptides in urine are limited. Aims: To compare urine and plasma NT-proBNP levels and to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of urine levels in heart failure (HF). Methods: Urinary and plasma NT-proBNP levels were measured in 96 HF patients and 20 control subjects. The patients were functionally classified according to the NYHA criteria. Results: Urine NT-proBNP was higher in HF patients than in control subjects (94 T 31 pg/ml vs. 67 T 6 pg/ml, p < 0.0001), correlating with plasma NT-proBNP levels (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001). Urinary levels were elevated in the more severe functional classes and diminished in obese patients. Urine NT-proBNP was a good tool for diagnosis of HF, the area under the curve (AUC) being 0.96 T 0.02 ( p < 0.0001), and for predicting 12-month cardiac events ( p = 0.011). To determine the prognostic power of urinary NT-proBNP in detecting 12-month cardiac mortality, we obtained an AUC of 0.75 T 0.10 ( p = 0.015). Conclusion: Urinary NT-proBNP, a relatively simple non-invasive test, is a new candidate marker for the diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis in HF and for the characterization of functional status in these patients.
Objectives: To examine N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) variability in plasma and urine samples of patients with stable heart failure (HF) during a 24-month follow-up. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Teaching hospital based study. Patients: 74 clinically and functionally stable patients (NYHA class 2¡0.5) out of 114 patients diagnosed with HF were followed up, and NT-proBNP plasma and urine levels were measured at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Results: Significant differences in mean urinary levels (p,0.01) were found during follow-up, but no changes were found in plasma. Bland-Altman plots showed few variations in plasma percentages in the three intervals (stage I-basal; stage II-stage I; stage II-basal) with a coefficient of reproducibility (CR) of 22%, 21% and 25%, respectively. Changes in NT-proBNP urinary levels had a CR of 7.1%, 6.8% and 9.4% at the three intervals, respectively. A good correlation was found between plasma and urinary levels of 0.001) and between the different NT-proBNP plasma (p,0.001) and urine measurements (p,0.001). Conclusions: NT-proBNP plasma and urine levels show good stability in a 24-month follow-up of patients with stable heart failure. Thus, assessment of urinary and plasma NT-proBNP concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring patients with HF during follow-up. The results suggest that variations in peptide concentrations exceeding 22% in plasma and 7% in urine in a 12-month follow-up and 25% and 9% in a 24-month follow-up may indicate pathophysiological changes.
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) may be useful in the diagnosis of heart failure and ventricular dysfunction. Obesity is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. The purpose of this study was to measure NT-proBNP plasma levels in obese and non-obese subjects with heart failure and to compare levels in subjects with ischaemic and dilated aetiology.In this study, obese subjects had 63% lower NT-proBNP plasma levels than non-obese subjects ( p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, BMI was inversely associated with NT-proBNP plasma levels ( p < 0.05) and a 17% decrease in natriuretic peptide levels was attributed to obesity ( p < 0.036). When we analyzed data according to the aetiology of heart failure, we found that both groups (ischaemic and dilated) had a 65% decrease in NT-proBNP plasma levels in obese subjects compared to non-obese subjects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.