Background/Objectives The safety and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccine in older adults with different frailty and disability profiles have not been well determined. Our objective was to analyze immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine in older adults across frailty and disability profiles. Design Multicenter longitudinal cohort study. Setting and participants A total of 134 residents aged ≥65 years with different frailty and disability profiles in five long‐term care facilities (LTCFs) in Albacete, Spain. Intervention and measurements Residents were administered two vaccine doses as per the label, and antibody levels were determined 21.9 days (SD 9.3) after both the first and second dose. Functional variables were assessed using activities of daily living (Barthel Index), and frailty status was determined with the FRAIL instrument. Cognitive status and comorbidity were also evaluated. Results Mean age was 82.9 years (range 65–99), and 71.6% were female. The mean antibody titers in residents with and without previous COVID‐19 infection were 49,878 AU/ml and 15,274 AU/ml, respectively (mean difference 34,604; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 27,699–41,509). No severe adverse reactions were observed, after either vaccine dose. Those with prevaccination COVID‐19 had an increased antibody level after the vaccine (B = 31,337; 95% CI: 22,725–39,950; p < 0.001). Frailty, disability, older age, sex, cognitive impairment, or comorbidities were not associated with different antibody titers. Conclusions The BNT162b2 mRNA COVID‐19 vaccine in older adults is safe and produces immunogenicity, independently of the frailty and disability profiles. Older adults in LTCFs should receive a COVID‐19 vaccine.

Background: Older adults are at the highest risk of severe disease and death due to COVID-19. Randomized data have shown that baricitinib improves outcomes in these patients, but focused stratified analyses of geriatric cohorts are lacking. Our objective was to analyze the efficacy of baricitinib in older adults with COVID-19 moderate-to-severe pneumonia. Methods: This is a propensity score [PS]-matched retrospective cohort study. Patients from the COVID-AGE and Alba-Score cohorts, hospitalized for moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia, were categorized in two age brackets of age <70 years old (86 with baricitinib and 86 PS-matched controls) or ≥70 years old (78 on baricitinib and 78 PS-matched controls). Thirty-day mortality rates were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.

Ovarian cancer is characterized by frequent mutations at TP53. These tumors also harbor germline mutations at homologous recombination repair genes, so they rely on DNA-damage checkpoint proteins, like the checkpoint kinase 1 (CHEK1) to induce G arrest. In our study, by using an approach, we identified a synthetic lethality interaction between CHEK1 and mitotic aurora kinase A (AURKA) inhibitors. Gene expression analyses were used for the identification of relevant biological functions. OVCAR3, OVCAR8, IGROV1, and SKOV3 were used for proliferation studies. Alisertib was tested as AURKA inhibitor and LY2603618 as CHEK1 inhibitor. Analyses of cell cycle and intracellular mediators were performed by flow cytometry and Western blot analysis. Impact on stem cell properties was evaluated by flow cytometry analysis of surface markers and sphere formation assays. Gene expression analyses followed by functional annotation identified a series of deregulated genes that belonged to cell cycle, including AURKA/B, TTK kinase, and CHEK1. AURKA and CHEK1 were amplified in 8.7% and 3.9% of ovarian cancers, respectively. AURKA and CHEK1 inhibitors showed a synergistic interaction in different cellular models. Combination of alisertib and LY2603618 triggered apoptosis, reduced the stem cell population, and increased the effect of taxanes and platinum compounds. Finally, expression of AURKA and CHEK1 was linked with detrimental outcome in patients. Our data describe a synthetic lethality interaction between CHEK1 and AURKA inhibitors with potential translation to the clinical setting..

Background: The ability to undertake molecular analysis to inform on prognosis and predictors of response to therapy is limited by accessibility of tissue. Measurement of total circulating free DNA (cfDNA) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral blood may allow easier access to tumor material and help to predict clinical outcomes.Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases identified publications exploring the association between cfDNA or ctDNA and overall survival (OS) in solid tumors. HRs for OS were extracted from multivariable analyses and included in a meta-analysis. Pooled HRs were computed and weighted using generic inverse variance and random-effect modeling. For studies not reporting multivariable analyses, univariable ORs were estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves for OS at 1 and 3 years.

Antigen recognition by MHC class I molecules is a key step for the initiation of the immune response. We hypothesized that expression of these molecules could be a marker of immune-activated breast cancers. Data from KM Plotter were extracted to develop an exploratory cohort. Information from Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and METABRIC was used to create two validation cohorts. Raw data were reprocessed and analyzed using plyr R and Bioconductor. We predicted epitope-HLA binding to MHC I molecules by using NetMHC 4.0. Cox proportional hazards regression was computed to correlate gene expression and survival outcome. There was a weak but positive correlation between mutational burden and the expression of most MHC class I molecules. In the exploratory cohort, expression of HLA-A and HLA-B was associated with favorable relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in the basal-like subgroup. This was confirmed in the METABRIC and TCGA dataset. Expression of HLA-A and HLA-B was associated with biomarkers of T cell activation (GZMA, GZMB, and PRF1) and improved the predictive capacity of known immunologic signatures. Several neopeptides expressed in breast cancer were also identified including FUK, SNAPC3, GC, ANO8, DOT1L, HIST1H3F, MYBPH, STX2, FRMD6, CPSF1, or SMTN, among others. Expression of HLA A and B is associated with T cell activation and identifies immune activated, basal-like breast cancers with favorable prognosis. Antigen recognition markers should be incorporated into the assessment of the tumor immune state of basal-like breast patients.