Background: We aimed to update the 2010 evidence- and consensus-based national clinical guideline on the diagnosis and management of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in adult patients. Results are published in 2 parts. Part 1 covers methods, the definition of patient groups, and diagnostics. This second publication focuses on treatment of acute episodes of cystitis and pyelonephritis as well as on prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs. Materials and Methods: An interdisciplinary group consisting of 17 representatives of 12 medical societies and a patient representative was formed. Systematic literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify literature published in 2010–2015. Results: For the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC), fosfomycin-trometamol, nitrofurantoin, nitroxoline, pivmecillinam, and trimethoprim (depending on the local rate of resistance) are all equally recommended. Cotrimoxazole, fluoroquinolones, and cephalosporins are not recommended as antibiotics of first choice, for concern of an unfavorable impact on the microbiome. Mild to moderate uncomplicated pyelonephritis should be treated with oral cefpodoxime, ceftibuten, ciprofloxacin, or levofloxacin. For AUC with mild to moderate symptoms, instead of antibiotics symptomatic treatment alone may be considered depending on patient preference after discussing adverse events and outcomes. Primarily non-antibiotic options are recommended for prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infection. Conclusion: In accordance with the global antibiotic stewardship initiative and considering new insights in scientific research, we updated our German clinical UTI guideline to promote a responsible antibiotic use and to give clear hands-on recommendations for the diagnosis and management of UTIs in adults in Germany for healthcare providers and patients.

Objectives: We aimed to update the 2010 evidence-and consensus-based national clinical guideline on the diagnosis and management of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in adult patients. Materials and Methods: An interdisciplinary group consisting of 17 representatives of 12 medical societies and a patient representative was formed. Systematic literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify literature published in 2010-2015. Results: We provide 75 recommendations and 68 statements in the updated evidence-and consensus-based national clinical guideline. The diagnostics part covers practical recommendations on cystitis and pyelonephritis for each defined patient group. Clinical examinations, as well as laboratory testing and microbiological pathogen assessment, are addressed. Conclusion: In accordance with the global antibiotic stewardship initiative and considering new insights in scientific research, we updated our German clinical UTI guideline to promote a responsible antibiotic use and to give clear hands-on recommendations for the diagnosis and management of UTIs in adults in Germany for healthcare providers and patients.

INTRODUCTIONThe course of acute pancreatitis ranges from a mild transitory edematous to a severe necrotizing form. Necrotizing pancreatitis occurs in about 20% of all patients suffering from acute pancreatitis [1] . If infection of the necrotic tissue occurs mortality rates of up to 50% are reported with sepsis and multiorgan failure as most frequent causes [2][3][4][5] . It is generally accepted that in infected necrotizing pancreatitis the infected non-vital solid tissue has to be removed in order to control the sepsis. The standard treatment has traditionally been surgery [5,6] . By using modern surgical techniques like open packing, repeated laparatomies, closed packing or closed continuous lavage mortality rates could be decreased to 20%-40% [7][8][9][10][11][12] . However, these techniques are associated with a considerable surgical trauma which often causes escalation of multiorgan failure and sepsis [7,13] . Moreover, total anaesthesia is mandatory. Thus, in the last decade minimal invasive treatment regimes and in particular percutaneous drainage therapy were included in the management of infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) guided placement of drainages is reported to be effective in up to 90% for drainage of fluid collections or abscesses with purely liquid content [14] . However, the success rates Abstract AIM: To assess the outcome of patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis treated by percutaneous drainage with special focus on the influence of drainage size and number.