Background:Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is increasingly used in children in a variety of anatomical and pathophysiological conditions, but published data are scarce.Objective:To record current practice and results of CRT in paediatric and congenital heart disease.Design:Retrospective multicentre European survey.Setting:Paediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery centres.Patients:One hundred and nine patients aged 0.24–73.8 (median 16.9) years with structural congenital heart disease (n = 87), congenital atrioventricular block (n = 12) and dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 10) with systemic left (n = 69), right (n = 36) or single (n = 4) ventricular dysfunction and ventricular dyssynchrony during sinus rhythm (n = 25) or associated with pacing (n = 84).Interventions:CRT for a median period of 7.5 months (concurrent cardiac surgery in 16/109).Main outcome measures:Functional improvement and echocardiographic change in systemic ventricular function.Results:The z score of the systemic ventricular end-diastolic dimension decreased by median 1.1 (p<0.001). Ejection fraction (EF) or fractional area of change increased by a mean (SD) of 11.5 (14.3)% (p<0.001) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved by median 1.0 grade (p<0.001). Non-response to CRT (18.5%) was multivariably predicted by the presence of primary dilated cardiomyopathy (p = 0.002) and poor NYHA class (p = 0.003). Presence of a systemic left ventricle was the strongest multivariable predictor of improvement in EF/fractional area of change (p<0.001). Results were independent of the number of patients treated in each contributing centre.Conclusion:Heart failure associated with ventricular pacing is the largest indication for CRT in paediatric and congenital heart disease. CRT efficacy varies widely with the underlying anatomical and pathophysiological substrate.

Objectives To compare the efficacy of beta-blockers (BB) in congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). Background BB are the mainstay in managing LQTS. Studies comparing the efficacy of commonly-used BB are lacking and clinicians generally assume they are equally effective. Methods ECG and clinical parameters of 382 LQT1/LQT2 patients initiated on propranolol (n=134), metoprolol (n=147), and nadolol (n=101) were analyzed, excluding patients aged <1 year at BB initiation. Symptoms prior to therapy and the first breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) were documented. Results Patients (56% females, 27% symptomatic, HR 76±16 bpm, QTc 472±46 ms) were started on BB therapy at a median age of 14 years (IQR 8–32 years). QTc-shortening with propranolol was significantly greater than with other BB in the total cohort and in the subset with QTc >480 ms. None of the asymptomatic patients had BCEs. Among symptomatic patients (n=101), 15 had BCEs (all syncopes). QTc-shortening was significantly less-pronounced among patients with BCEs. There was a greater risk of BCEs for symptomatic patients initiated on metoprolol compared to users of other two BB combined, after adjustment for genotype (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.2–13.1, p=0.025). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower event-free survival for symptomatic patients on metoprolol compared to propranolol/nadolol. Conclusions Propranolol has a significantly better QTc-shortening effect compared to metoprolol and nadolol, especially in patients with prolonged QTc. Propranolol and nadolol are equally effective whereas symptomatic patients started on metoprolol are at a significantly higher risk for BCEs. Metoprolol should not be used in symptomatic LQT1 and LQT2 patients.

No abstract

Background-Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome associated with mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene (RYR2) in the majority of patients. Previous studies of CPVT patients mainly involved probands, so current insight into disease penetrance, expression, genotype-phenotype correlations, and arrhythmic event rates in relatives carrying a RYR2 mutation is limited. Methods and Results-One-hundred sixteen relatives carrying a RYR2 mutation from 15 families who were identified by cascade screening of the RYR2 mutation causing CPVT in the proband were clinically characterized, including 61 relatives from 1 family. Fifty-four of 108 antiarrhythmic drug-free relatives (50%) had a CPVT phenotype at the first cardiological examination, including 27 (25%) with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Relatives carrying a RYR2 mutation in the C-terminal channel-forming domain showed an increased odds of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (odds ratio, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5-11.5; P=0.007, compared with N-terminal domain). Sinus bradycardia was observed in 19% of relatives, whereas other supraventricular dysrhythmias were present in 16%. Ninety-eight (most actively treated) relatives (84%) were followed up for a median of 4.7 years (range, 0.3-19.0 years). During follow-up, 2 asymptomatic relatives experienced exercise-induced syncope. One relative was not being treated, whereas the other was noncompliant. None of the 116 relatives died of CPVT during a 6.7-year follow-up (range, 1.4-20.9 years). Conclusions-Relatives carrying an RYR2 mutation show a marked phenotypic diversity. The vast majority do not have signs of supraventricular disease manifestations. Mutation location may be associated with severity of the phenotype. The arrhythmic event rate during follow-up was low. (Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:748-756.)