BACKGROUND Locally persistent or recurrent anal carcinoma represents a clinically significant problem, the management of which remains the subject of some controversy. Although the few current data suggest that radical surgery remains the sole salvage treatment able to provide some chance of cure, some authors have reported disappointingly low success rates. The current study presents the outcome of patients who failed locally after receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for anal carcinoma. METHODS Of 185 consecutive patients treated between January 1976 and December 1996 with sphincter conservation, 42 subsequently presented with local failure, either alone (27 patients) or with regional or distant metastases (15 patients). Nine patients (21%) received supportive care only, 7 patients (17%) received palliative therapy, and 26 patients (62%) underwent potentially curative surgical salvage treatment, including 23 abdominoperineal resections (APR) and 3 local excisions. The median follow‐up after local failure for all patients was 21.5 months (range, 1–231 months). RESULTS With the exception of 2 patients who committed suicide, all patients who did not undergo surgical salvage therapy died of progressive disease. Among 26 patients who received curative treatment, 11 ultimately achieved disease control. The 5‐year overall survival rate after the diagnosis of local failure was 28% for all patients and 44.5% for those receiving curative salvage treatment. For the latter group the 5‐year actuarial secondary local and locoregional control rates were 53% and 43%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although APR no longer is the first‐line treatment of patients with anal carcinoma, it continues to play an essential role in salvage therapy, resulting in ultimate disease control in approximately 50% of patients with isolated local failure. The curative potential of secondary surgical treatment suggests the possible importance of early detection of persistent or recurrent local disease after nonsurgical, sphincter‐conserving therapy. Cancer 1999;86:405–9. © 1999 American Cancer Society.
Summary This study was conducted to assess long-term Quality of Life (QOL) in patients treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for anal carcinomas. Patients with a maximum age of 80 years, and who were alive at least 3 years following completion of treatment with a functioning anal sphincter and without active disease, were selected for this study. Of 52 such patients identified, 41 (79%) were evaluable. There were 35 females and six males with a median age of 71 years (55-80). The median follow-up interval was 116 months (range 37-218). QOL was assessed using two self-rating questionnaires developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: one for cancer-specific QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) and one for site-specific QOL (EORTC QLQ-CR38). For the function scales a higher score represents a higher level of functioning (100 being the best score), whereas for the symptom scales a higher score indicates a higher level of symptomatology/problems (0 being the best score). For the QLQ-C30, the functional scale scores ranged from 71 (global quality of life) to 85 (role function) and the symptom scale scores from 6 (nausea-vomiting) to 28 (diarrhoea). For the QLQ-CR38 module the functional scale scores ranged from 13 (sexual functioning) to 74 (body image) and for the symptom scale scores from 5 (weight loss) to 66 (sexual dysfunction in males). None of the functional and symptom scale scores seemed to be better in patients with longer followup. In patients treated with sphincter conservation for anal carcinomas, long-term QOL as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 appears to be acceptable, with the exception of diarrhoea and perhaps sexual function. Moreover, the subset of patients who presented with severe complications and/or anal dysfunction showed poorer scores in most scales.
After hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, delayed immune hemolysis may occur when donor-derived B lymphocytes carried with the graft produce immune antibodies against the recipient's incompatible red cells. We report the occurrence of this syndrome in the context of minor blood group incompatibility between donor and recipient after peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. On day 12 post-transplant there was abrupt onset of hemolysis necessitating supportive treatment with hydration and transfusions. Because, as compared to bone marrow, PBSC grafts are enriched with lymphocytes, more frequent and intense delayed immune hemolysis may be anticipated when using PBSC. This complication is described most often when cyclosporine alone is used for immunosuppression following the graft. The addition of methotrexate, which with CyA forms the classic regimen for the prevention of graft-vs-host disease, may diminish the frequence and severity of this adverse reaction.
The feasibility of combining cladribine with cyclophosphamide and prednisone in the management of indolent lymphoid malignancies was determined. Nineteen patients [nine chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), seven non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and three macroglobulinaemia (M))] received cladribine 0.1 mg kg −1 per day as a subcutaneous bolus injection on days 1–3 (up to 5 injections) with intravenous cyclophosphamide 500 mg m −2 on day 1 and oral prednisone 40 mg m −2 on days 1–5 at 4-weekly intervals up to a maximum of six courses. A total of 80 courses were given. Overall response rate was 88%, with four patients achieving a complete clinical and haematological response and 12 achieving a partial response. Neutropenia WHO grade 4 in two patients and WHO grade 3 infection in one patient were the limiting toxicities on treatment. During the follow-up, WHO grade ≥3 haematological complications occurred in five patients and WHO grade ≥3 non-haematological complications in five patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the cladribine/cyclophosphamide/prednisone (CCP) combination that appears highly active and safe in the management of indolent lymphoid malignancies. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaign
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.