Summary Background Findings of small studies have suggested that short treatments with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies that are mutated to reduce Fc receptor binding preserve β-cell function and decrease insulin needs in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. In this phase 3 trial, we assessed the safety and efficacy of one such antibody, teplizumab. Methods In this 2-year trial, patients aged 8–35 years who had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes for 12 weeks or fewer were enrolled and treated at 83 clinical centres in North America, Europe, Israel, and India. Participants were allocated (2:1:1:1 ratio) by an interactive telephone system, according to computer-generated block randomisation, to receive one of three regimens of teplizumab infusions (14-day full dose, 14-day low dose, or 6-day full dose) or placebo at baseline and at 26 weeks. The Protégé study is still underway, and patients and study staff remain masked through to study closure. The primary composite outcome was the percentage of patients with insulin use of less than 0.5 U/kg per day and glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) of less than 6.5% at 1 year. Analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00385697. Findings 763 patients were screened, of whom 516 were randomised to receive 14-day full-dose teplizumab (n=209), 14-day low-dose teplizumab (n=102), 6-day full-dose teplizumab (n=106), or placebo (n=99). Two patients in the 14-day full-dose group and one patient in the placebo group did not start treatment, so 513 patients were eligible for efficacy analyses. The primary outcome did not differ between groups at 1 year: 19·8% (41/207) in the 14-day full-dose group; 13·7% (14/102) in the 14-day low-dose group; 20·8% (22/106) in the 6-day full-dose group; and 20·4% (20/98) in the placebo group. 5% (19/415) of patients in the teplizumab groups were not taking insulin at 1 year, compared with no patients in the placebo group at 1 year (p=0·03). Across the four study groups, similar proportions of patients had adverse events (414/417 [99%] in the teplizumab groups vs 98/99 [99%] in the placebo group) and serious adverse events (42/417 [10%] vs 9/99 [9%]). The most common clinical adverse event in the teplizumab groups was rash (220/417 [53%] vs 20/99 [20%] in the placebo group). Interpretation Findings of exploratory analyses suggest that future studies of immunotherapeutic intervention with teplizumab might have increased success in prevention of a decline in β-cell function (measured by C-peptide) and provision of glycaemic control at reduced doses of insulin if they target patients early after diagnosis of diabetes and children.
Purpose: Patients with relapsed pediatric solid tumors and CNS malignancies have few therapeutic options and frequently die of their disease. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown tremendous success in treating relapsed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but this has not yet translated to treating solid tumors. This is partially due to a paucity of differentially expressed cell surface molecules on solid tumors that can be safely targeted. Here, we present B7-H3 (CD276) as a putative target for CAR T-cell therapy of pediatric solid tumors, including those arising in the central nervous system.Experimental Design: We developed a novel B7-H3 CAR whose binder is derived from a mAb that has been shown to preferentially bind tumor tissues and has been safely used in humans in early-phase clinical trials. We tested B7-H3 CAR T cells in a variety of pediatric cancer models.Results: B7-H3 CAR T cells mediate significant antitumor activity in vivo, causing regression of established solid tumors in xenograft models including osteosarcoma, medulloblastoma, and Ewing sarcoma. We demonstrate that B7-H3 CAR T-cell efficacy is largely dependent upon high surface target antigen density on tumor tissues and that activity is greatly diminished against target cells that express low levels of antigen, thus providing a possible therapeutic window despite low-level normal tissue expression of B7-H3.Conclusions: B7-H3 CAR T cells could represent an exciting therapeutic option for patients with certain lethal relapsed or refractory pediatric malignancies, and should be tested in carefully designed clinical trials.
; for the SOPHIA Study Group IMPORTANCE ERRB2 (formerly HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains typically incurable with optimal treatment undefined in later lines of therapy. The chimeric antibody margetuximab shares ERBB2 specificity with trastuzumab but incorporates an engineered Fc region to increase immune activation. OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab, each with chemotherapy, in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive ABC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The SOPHIA phase 3 randomized open-label trial of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs trastuzumab plus chemotherapy enrolled 536 patients from August 26, 2015, to October 10, 2018, at 166 sites in 17 countries. Eligible patients had disease progression on 2 or more prior anti-ERBB2 therapies and 1 to 3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease. Data were analyzed from February 2019 to October 2019. INTERVENTIONS Investigators selected chemotherapy before 1:1 randomization to margetuximab, 15 mg/kg, or trastuzumab, 6 mg/kg (loading dose, 8 mg/kg), each in 3-week cycles. Stratification factors were metastatic sites (Յ2, >2), lines of therapy (Յ2, >2), and chemotherapy choice. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Sequential primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by central blinded analysis and overall survival (OS). All α was allocated to PFS, followed by OS. Secondary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and objective response rate by central blinded analysis. RESULTS Atotalof536patientswererandomizedtoreceivemargetuximab(n = 266)ortrastuzumab (n = 270). The median age was 56 (27-86) years; 266 (100%) women were in the margetuximab group, while 267 (98.9%) women were in the trastuzumab group. Groups were balanced. Allbut1patienthadreceivedpriorpertuzumab,and489(91.2%)hadreceivedpriorado-trastuzumab emtansine. Margetuximab improved primary PFS over trastuzumab with 24% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR]
The final differentiation or maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) in response to environmental stimuli influences their ability to both initiate immunity and determine the quality of the response to antigens. Circulating immune complexes and cell-bound immunoglobulins present in normal human sera represent a potential stimulus for inadvertent DC activation in the steady state and during autoimmunity. Here, we show that selective blockade of the inhibitory Fc␥ receptor (Fc␥R) Fc␥RIIb with recently developed monoclonal antibodies leads to maturation of human monocytederived DCs, which depends on the presence of IgG in normal human plasma. Plasma, in the presence of an Fc␥RIIb blockade, caused the DCs to up-regulate the expression of costimulatory molecules and to produce the inflammatory mediator IL-12p70. Fc␥RIIb blockade of DCs loaded with tumor cells led to increased tumor-specific T cell immunity without the need for exogenous stimuli other than human plasma. Therefore, the activation status of DCs in the presence of normal human serum depends on the balance between activating and inhibitory Fc␥Rs and can be enhanced by new antibodies that react selectively with Fc␥RIIb. These data suggest an approach for modifying this balance to enhance immunity to immune complexes and antibody-coated tumor cells and to silence DC activation by immune complexes in autoimmune states.autoimmunity ͉ monoclonal antibody ͉ myeloma ͉ vaccination ͉ crosspresentation D endritic cells (DCs) are highly differentiated antigenpresenting cells that play a key role in the initiation and regulation of T cell immunity to pathogens and tumors while at the same time preventing immune responses against self-tissues or environmental antigens (1, 2). A critical property of DCs is that their ability to activate or inhibit immunity is linked to environmental stimuli, which determine their final differentiation or maturation status (3). Several stimuli, such as pathogens recognized by means of Toll-like receptors, CD40L, heat shock proteins, inflammatory cytokines, and innate lymphocytes, can lead to DC maturation and T cell immunity (2). However, under steady state, DCs must avoid inappropriate activation to prevent responses to self-antigens (''horror autotoxicus'') and harmless environmental antigens (4, 5). Specific pathways that prevent spontaneous DC activation are not as well understood as microbial and inflammatory stimuli.Circulating immune complexes and cell-bound immunoglobulins present in normal human sera represent a potential stimulus for DC activation in the steady state (6). The physiologic consequences of cell-bound IgG and immune complexes are modulated by a balance between activating and inhibitory Fc␥ receptors (Fc␥Rs) and include immune regulatory and inflammatory responses (7-10). Engagement of activating Fc␥Rs that contain an immune tyrosine-based activation motif on effector cells, including monocytes, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and mast cells, mediates phagocytosis, antibody-dependent cellmediated cytotoxicity, and r...
IntroductionTargeted mAb-based therapies provide effective and safe treatments for hematologic malignancies. Rituximab, which specifically targets the B-cell antigen CD20, has had the greatest success, revolutionizing the treatment of the 2 most common forms of nonHodgkin lymphoma: follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In addition, mAb-based therapies targeting CD52 (alemtuzumab) and CD33 (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) have been approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute myelogenous leukemia, respectively. Despite the progress of these strategies, they do have limitations. Only a fraction of patients respond to rituximab, and the majority of those who do respond will eventually relapse. Treatment with alemtuzumab and gemtuzumab are limited by safety concerns, and many additional hematologic malignancies do not respond to treatment with any of these targeted therapies. Various therapies based on alternate mAbs, including second-generation anti-CD20 mAbs and those targeting alternate cell-surface proteins such as CD19, CD22, CD30, CD37, CD40, and CD74, have been developed and are at different stages of clinical testing in the hopes of providing approaches to treating a broader spectrum of hematologic malignancies that are poorly served by existing therapies. 1,2 Whereas targeting of cell-surface antigens themselves can mediate antitumor activity through the induction of apoptosis, most mAb-based activity against hematologic malignancies is reliant on either Fc-mediated effector functions such as complementdependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity 3,4 or is engineered through the conjugation of an immunotoxin or radiolabeled isotope. 1 Considering the potential of naturally occurring CTLs to mediate cell lysis, various strategies have also been explored to recruit CTLs to mediate tumor cell killing. Tumor-specific CTLs exert extremely potent effects through recognition of the corresponding peptide/MHC complex recognized by their TCR, and are among the most potent cells that mediate antitumor effects. A major limitation in generating tumorspecific CTLs in vivo is that their induction requires the use of vaccine strategies, such as dendritic cell-based vaccines, 5 that are capable of breaking tolerance to cancer self-antigens. One alternative is ex vivo expansion and activation of rare, tumor-specific CTLs for reinfusion into cancer patients. 6 However, cancer cells can down-regulate MHC expression as an escape mechanism, thus preventing the ability of CTLs to recognize their antigenic peptide. The genetic manipulation of patients' T cells to express chimeric antigen receptors comprising a tumor-specific antigen and T cellactivating properties before their adoptive transfer provides a non-MHC-restricted approach to targeting cancer, as was shown recently in the treatment of lymphoma with T cells engineered to recognize CD19. 7 However, the patient-specific manipulation and risk associated with this procedure represent major limitations to its expanded use. Alt...
Despite recent advancements, approximately 50% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) do not respond to induction therapy (primary induction failure, PIF) or relapse after <6 months (early relapse, ER). We have recently shown an association between an immune-infiltrated tumor microenvironment (TME) and resistance to cytarabine-based chemotherapy but responsiveness to flotetuzumab, a bispecific DART® antibody-based molecule to CD3ε and CD123. This study reports the results of a multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study of flotetuzumab in adults with relapsed/refractory AML. Eighty-eight AML patients were enrolled, 42 in dose-finding and 46 at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 500ng/kg/day. Consistent with flotetuzumab's mode of action, the most frequent adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRR)/cytokine release syndrome (CRS), the majority as grade 1-2. Stepwise dosing during week 1, pre-treatment dexamethasone, prompt use of tocilizumab and temporary dose reductions/interruptions successfully prevented severe IRR/CRS, resulting in acceptable tolerability. Clinical benefit accrued to PIF/ER AML patients, who showed an immune-infiltrated TME. Among 30 PIF/ER patients treated at the RP2D, the CR/CRh rate was 26.7%, with an overall response rate (CR/CRh/CRi) of 30.0%. In PIF/ER patients who achieved CR/CRh, median OS was 10.2 months (range 1.87-27.27), with 6- and 12-month survival rates of 75% (95%CI, 0.450-1.05) and 50% (95%CI, 0.154-0.846). Bone marrow transcriptomic analysis showed that a parsimonious 10-gene signature predicted complete responses to flotetuzumab (AUROC=0.904 versus 0.672 for the ELN risk classifier). Flotetuzumab represents an innovative experimental approach associated with acceptable safety and encouraging evidence of activity in PIF/ER AML patients. Trial registration number: NCT02152956.
Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are widely used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and autoimmune diseases. Although the mechanism of action in vivo is not always known, the therapeutic activity of several approved mAbs depends on the binding of the Fc; regions to low-affinity Fc; receptors (Fc;R) expressed on effector cells. We did functional genetic screens to identify IgG1 Fc domains with improved binding to the low-affinity activating Fc receptor CD16A (Fc;RIIIA) and reduced binding to the low-affinity inhibitory Fc receptor, CD32B (Fc;RIIB). Identification of new amino acid residues important for Fc;R binding guided the construction of an Fc domain that showed a dramatically enhanced CD16A binding and greater than a 100-fold improvement in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In a xenograft murine model of B-cell malignancy, the greatest enhancement of an Fc-optimized anti-human B-cell mAb was accounted for by improved binding to Fc;RIV, a unique mouse activating Fc;R that is expressed by monocytes and macrophages but not natural killer (NK) cells, consistent with experimental and clinical data suggesting that mononuclear phagocytes, effector cells expressing both activating and inhibitory Fc;R, are critical mediators of B-cell depletion in vivo. By using mice transgenic for human CD16A, enhanced survival was observed due to expression of CD16A-158 phe on monocytes and macrophages as well as on NK cells in these mice. The design of new generations of improved antibodies for immunotherapy should aim at Fc optimization to increase the engagement of activating Fc;R present on the surface of tumor-infiltrating effector cell populations. [Cancer Res 2007;67(18):8882-90]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.