Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

No abstract

Terminal deletions of chromosome 3p26.3 confined to the CHL1 gene have previously been described in children with intellectual disability and epilepsy. Here, we report for the first time, a 3p26.3 duplication including only the CHL1 gene in an intellectually disabled girl with epilepsy. The penetrance of both deletions and duplications in 3p26.3 is reduced because all chromosomal imbalances were inherited from healthy parents. Further studies are needed to specify the pathogenic mechanism of 3p26.3 imbalances and to estimate recurrence risks in genetic counseling. However, the description of both deletions and duplications of chromosome 3p26.3 in nonsyndromic intellectual disability suggests that CHL1 is a dosage-sensitive gene with an important role for normal cognitive development.

Objective About 3% of newborns show malformations, with about 20% of the affected having genetic causes. Clarification of genetic diseases in postnatal diagnostics was significantly improved with high‐throughput sequencing, in particular through whole exome sequencing covering all protein‐coding regions. Here, we aim to extend the use of this technology to prenatal diagnostics. Method Between 07/2018 and 10/2020, 500 pregnancies with fetal ultrasound abnormalities were analyzed after genetic counseling as part of prenatal diagnostics using WES of the fetus and parents. Results Molecular genetic findings could explain ultrasound abnormalities in 38% of affected fetuses. In 47% of these, disease‐causing de novo variants were found. Pathogenic variants in genes with autosomal recessive or X‐linked inheritance were detected in more than one‐third (70/189 = 37%). The latter are associated with increased probability of recurrence, making their detection important for further pregnancies. Average time from sample receipt to report was 12 days in the recent cases. Conclusion Trio exome sequencing is a useful addition to prenatal diagnostics due to its high diagnostic yield and short processing time (comparable to chromosome analysis). It covers a wide spectrum of genetic changes. Comprehensive interdisciplinary counseling before and after diagnostics is indispensable.