78 patients in PD were retrospectively analyzed in 2 time ranges. Pre CV19 (Nov 19 to March 20, 5 months) and During CV19 (April 20 to August 20, 5 months). We compared the results of both. The clinical results analyzed in Table 1. Statistical analysis with Chi square and T Student. Average age 51.5 years. During CV19, on-site attentions were significantly reduced, increasing telemetric attentions. Blood pressure, diuresis, edema, UF rate, Hemoglobin, phosphorus, iPTH, Kt/V, Albumin, EPO dosage, hospitalization rate, weight, remained very similar in both periods. 3 patient had Peritonitis in preCV19 period, compared with 4 in CV19 period. 4 patients tested positive for SARS COV2 (5.1%) all community and family acquired, 1 died. Lower rate of ES infection and a higher rate of other complications during CV19 (transient hypotension/hypertension, UF transient failure, all telemetrically well managed) were detected. Conclusions: Telemetric model of care allows adequate control of patients. The clinical measured parameters, did not suffer changes, remaining stable, comparing the two periods, with on-site compared with telemetric controls. It was observed that 5% suffered CV19. 1 died. Complication rates were similar. The number of patients developed peritonitis and hospitalization rates were no statistically different. The telemetric control model has no clinical differences with on-site results. It could be maintained in the future, combined with on-site attentions, especially in the remote patient.