The Family Evaluation of Hospice Services was used to document bereaved family members' perceptions of whether their loved ones were referred too late to hospice and to examine the association of that perception and quality of end-of-life care. A mortality follow-back survey of bereaved family members from two not-for-profit hospices found that 13.7% of decedents were referred at a time too late for hospice services. Family members of persons referred too late reported lower satisfaction with hospice services, a higher rate of unmet needs for information about what to expect at time of death, lower confidence in participating in patient care at home, more concerns with coordination of care, and lower overall satisfaction. Families reported physicians as an important barrier to earlier hospice referral in nearly one-half of cases. These results indicate a need for improved services for shorter-stay hospice patients/families and for physicians to help facilitate earlier hospice admission.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective Dying in the intensive care unit (ICU) has changed over the last twenty years due to increased utilization of palliative care. We sought to examine how palliative medicine (PM) integration into critical care medicine has changed outcomes in end of life including the utilization of do not resuscitate (no cardiopulmonary resuscitation but continue treatment) and comfort care orders (No resuscitation, only comfort medication). Design: Retrospective observational review of critical care patients who died during admission between two decades, 2008 to 09 and 2018 to 19. Setting: Single urban tertiary care academic medical center in Washington, D.C. Patients: Adult patients who were treated in any ICU during the admission which they died. Interventions and Measurements We sought to measure PM involvement across the two decades and its association with end of life care including do not resuscitate (DNR) and comfort care (CC) orders. Main Results: 571 cases were analyzed. Mean age was 65 ± 15, 46% were female. In univariate analysis significantly more patients received PM in 2018 to 19 (40% vs. 27%, p = .002). DNR status increased significantly over time (74% to 84%, p = .002) and was significantly more common in patients who were receiving PM (96% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). CC also increased over time (56% to 70%, p = <0.001), and was more common in PM patients (87% vs. 53%, p < 0.001). Death in the ICU decreased significantly over time (94% to 86%, p = .002) and was significantly lower in PM patients (76% vs. 96%, p < 0.001). The adjusted odds of getting CC for those receiving versus those not receiving PM were 14.51 (5.49-38.36, p < 0.001) in 2008 to 09 versus 3.89 (2.27-6.68, p < 0.001) in 2018 to 19. Conclusion: PM involvement increased significantly across a decade in our ICU and was significantly associated with incidence of DNR and CC orders as well as the decreased incidence of dying in the ICU. The increase in DNR and CC orders independent of PM over the past decade reflect intensivists delivering PM services.

Background Ensuring high-quality patient-centered care for critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients presents unprecedented challenges. Many patients become critically ill unexpectedly and have not previously discussed their health-care wishes. Clinicians lack experience with this illness and therefore struggle to predict patient outcomes. Measures Critical care medicine (CCM) providers were surveyed about the effectiveness and efficiency of a pilot intervention. Intervention Proactive palliative care rounding with CCM providers on COVID-19 intensive care units. Outcomes Fifty-four percent of CCM providers responded to the survey (21/39). CCM providers rated the intervention highly across all domains. CCM providers frequently identified that early palliative involvement was critical to providing families with information and support when separated from their loved ones. Conclusions/Lessons Learned This pilot study found that proactive rounding improves critical care provider assessments of quality of care for patients and families and allows CCM providers to focus their efforts on managing complex physiology and surges.