Avulsion injuries are common among participants in organized sports, especially among adolescent participants. Imaging features of both acute and chronic avulsion injuries of the pelvis, knee, ankle and foot, shoulder, and elbow were evaluated to help distinguish these injuries from more serious disease processes such as neoplasm and infection. At radiography, acute injuries (ie, those resulting from extreme, unbalanced, often eccentric muscular contractions) may be associated with avulsed bone fragments, whereas subacute injuries have an aggressive appearance that may include areas of mixed lysis and sclerosis. Chronic injuries (ie, those resulting from repetitive microtrauma or overuse) or old inactive injuries may be associated with a protuberant mass of bone and may bear a striking resemblance to a neoplastic or infectious process. Although not usually required, computed tomography is helpful in the diagnosis if radiographic findings are equivocal or if the injury is not in the acute phase. MR imaging is best suited for the evaluation of injuries to muscles, tendons, and ligaments. Recognition of characteristic imaging features and familiarity with musculotendinous anatomy will aid in accurate diagnosis of avulsion injuries.

Fifty standing dorsoplantar and lateral foot radiographs were obtained on a consecutive series of patients seen in an orthopaedic foot and ankle clinic. These radiographs were duplicated, and eight common foot measurements were made on each pair by six experienced examiners. Measurements were made in two ways: first by a subjective visual assessment, and second by quantitative evaluation made according to strictly defined criteria. All measurements were made under controlled, ideal conditions with similar high quality goniometers. The results demonstrated overall greater reliability in the quantitative methods than the non-quantitative methods. For each of the quantitative techniques, a cumulated frequency distribution of differences between examiners was calculated. The approximate 95% bounds for these measures were: hallux-metatarsophalangeal angle = 6 degrees, first intermetatarsal angle = 4 degrees, metatarsophalangeal-5 angle = 11 degrees, fourth intermetatarsal angle = 4 degrees, AP talocalcaneal angle = 20 degrees, lateral talocalcaneal angle = 12 degrees, sesamoid station = 2 grades, and forefoot width = 5 mm. Physicians using these parameters to make decisions regarding patient care and clinical outcomes need to keep in mind these potential errors in making foot radiographic measurements.

No abstract

Poor outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation are associated with certain types of posterior wall fracture patterns.