The study aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two low-dose vaginal estrogen treatments (ETs) and of a non-hormonal vaginal moisturizer in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors with urogenital atrophy. Eighteen patients receiving estriol cream 0.25 mg (n = 10) or estradiol tablets 12.5 microg (n = 8) twice/week for 12 weeks were evaluated and compared with eight patients treated with polycarbophil-based moisturizer 2.5 g twice/week. Severity of vaginal atrophy was assessed using subjective [Vaginal Symptoms Score (VSS), Profile of Female Sexual Function (PFSF)] and objective [Vaginal Health Index (VHI), Karyopycnotic Index (KI)] evaluations, while safety by measuring endometrial thickness and serum sex hormones levels. After 4 weeks, VSS and VHI were significantly improved by both vaginal ETs, with further improvement after 12 weeks. PFSF improved significantly only in estriol group (p = 0.02). Safety measurements did not significantly change. Vaginal moisturizer improved VSS at week 4 (p = 0.01), but score returned to pre-treatment values at week 12; no significant modification of VHI, KI, PFSF was recorded. Both low-dose vaginal ET are effective for relieving urogenital atrophy, while non-hormonal moisturizer only provides transient benefit. The increase of serum estrogens levels during treatment with vaginal estrogen at these dosages is minimal.

Lower limb lymphedema and NC are more frequent than expected. They are related to the radicality of lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. They affect the quality of life of the patients treated for gynecological cancer and their perceptions of healing. Minor complications are commonly persistent and need a prompt diagnosis and a specialized management to improve their prognosis.

No abstract

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the local staging of breast cancer is currently uncertain. The purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative MRI compared to conventional imaging in detecting breast cancer and the effect of pre-operative MRI on the surgical treatment in a subgroup of women with dense breasts, young age, invasive lobular cancer (ILC) or multiple lesions. Methods:Between January 2006 and October 2007, 91 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent preoperative clinical breast examination, mammography, bilateral breast ultrasonography and high-resolution breast MRI. All patients had histologically verified breast cancer. The imaging techniques were compared using the final pathological report as gold standard.Results: The sensitivity of MRI for the main lesion was 98.9%, while for multiple lesions sensitivity was 90.7% and specificity 85.4%. After preoperative MRI, 13 patients (14.3%) underwent additional fine needle/core biopsies, 9 of whom had specimen positive for cancer. Preoperative MRI changed the surgical plan in 26 patients: in 19.8% of the cases breast conservative surgery was converted to mastectomy and in 7.7% of the patients a wider excision was performed. At a mean follow-up of 48 months, 2 local recurrences occurred (local failure rate = 2.5%). Conclusions:Enhanced sensitivity of breast MRI may change the surgical approach, by increasing mastectomy rate or suggesting the need of wider local excision. MRI can play an important role in preoperative planning if used in selected patients with high risk of multifocal/multicentric lesions. However, the histologic confirmation of all suspicious findings detected by MRI is mandatory prior to definite surgery.