No abstract

BackgroundThe early COVID-19 pandemic period significantly strained the US healthcare system. During this period, consultations and admissions for acute medical conditions decreased, which was associated with an increase in disease-specific morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we sought to determine what, if any, effect the early COVID-19 pandemic period had on the presentation, management, and histopathologic severity of acute appendicitis.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, observational study to compare the frequencies with which patients presented with acute appendicitis, the proportion of whom were managed surgically, and the distribution of histopathologic disease severity among all resected appendix specimens during the early COVID-19 pandemic period (March 6–June 30, 2020) to equivalent time periods for the 3 preceding/pre-pandemic years (2017–2019).ResultsCompared with equivalent pre-pandemic time periods, during the COVID-19 pandemic period there was no significant difference in the number of patients who presented for acute appendicitis, there was a decreased rate of surgical management (81% vs 94%; p=0.014), and there was an overall increase in the incidence of perforated appendicitis (31% vs 16%; p=0.004), including by histopathologic diagnosis (25% vs 11%; p=0.01).DiscussionDespite potential patient hesitancy to present for care, the early COVID-19 pandemic period was associated with no significant change in the number of patients presenting with acute appendicitis; however, there was a significant increase in the incidence of perforated appendicitis. This study highlights the need to encourage patients to avoid late presentation for acute surgical conditions and for the robust planning for the medical management of otherwise surgical abnormalities during episodes of restricted or limited resources.Level of evidenceLevel III.

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction is associated with lengthy operative times that remain an issue for plastic surgeons today. The main objective of this study was to determine if a 2-stage deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction resulted in a shorter total plastic surgeon operative time compared with an immediate reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction from February 2013 to July 2020 by the senior author. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, mastectomy characteristics, expander placement, reconstructive procedures, operative time, and complications were tabulated. Results: The study included a total of 128 patients. For immediate/1-stage flap reconstruction, average operative times for the plastic surgeon were 427.0 minutes for unilateral procedures, and 506.3 minutes for bilateral procedures. For delayed/2-stage reconstruction, average combined plastic surgeon operative times were 351.1 minutes for unilateral expander followed by flap reconstruction (75.9 minutes shorter than immediate unilateral, P = 0.007), and 464.8 minutes for bilateral reconstruction (41.5 minutes shorter than immediate bilateral, P = 0.04). Total patient time under anesthesia was longer for 2-staged bilateral reconstruction ( P = 0.0001), but did not differ significantly for unilateral reconstruction. Complications between immediate and delayed groups were not significantly different. Conclusions: We found that staged reconstruction over 2 procedures resulted in a significant reduction in operative time for the plastic surgeon for both unilateral and bilateral reconstruction. With amenable breast surgeons and patients, the advantages of controlling scheduling and the operating room may encourage plastic surgeons to consider performing free flap reconstruction in a delayed fashion.

Electric scooters are an increasingly common and convenient mode of transportation worldwide and have effectively revolutionized the shared micromobility industry. As electric scooter sharing companies have increased in popularity there has been a concomitant increase in the frequency of all electric scooter-related injuries. The purpose of this study is to describe the most up-to-date trends in craniofacial fractures and lacerations related to electric scooter use among all age groups. We queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) for craniofacial fractures and lacerations related to e-scooters between 2010 and 2019. We then compared injury trends over time and between time periods before and after 2017 when electric scooter share apps revolutionized micromobility. We compared incidence of injury overall and by day of the week, patient demographics, and case severity based on clinical disposition. We identified an increase in the frequency of craniofacial lacerations and fractures in the 3 years following the introduction of electric scooter share services in 2017 (2017 and 2019), compared to the 3 years before this time (2014-2016). Young adults (18-39 years) were the age group with the greatest interval increase in craniofacial injuries. There was also an increase in number of craniofacial injuries occurring on Mondays and a decrease number occurring on Fridays in the later time period. Finally, patients who presented with electric scooter-related craniofacial injuries in this later time period showed a higher frequency of overnight observation and hospital admission for their injuries. The number of craniofacial injuries secondary to electric scooter use has increased dramatically since the introduction of share services. Craniofacial fractures and lacerations are a common reason for craniofacial or maxillofacial surgery consultation and understanding these patterns of injury will help prepare surgeons for patient care, preventative education, and public advocacy.

No abstract