No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

[1] Epoxy models have been used as analogs for fractured rock surfaces in many laboratory investigations of multiphase flow processes. However, there is no agreement on how well or poorly such an analog replicates the surface chemistry of geologic materials, nor is there a satisfactory analysis of the surface properties of epoxy. This paper addresses the issue of accurately characterizing the surface chemistry of a typical epoxy used in laboratory multiphase flow studies and comparing that surface to a polystyrene surface and a radio frequency glow discharge treated polystyrene surface. Surface properties were determined using direct contact angle measurements of polar and apolar liquids on flat test samples. The epoxy was determined to have surface properties as follows: g = 62.3, g LW = 39, g AB = 23.3, g È = 0, and g É = 23.3 mJ/m 2 , where g is the total surface tension of the solid, g LW is the Lifshitz-van der Waals (LW) surface tension component, g AB is the Lewis acid base (AB) surface tension component, g É is the electron-donor (negative) parameter, and g È is the electron-acceptor (positive) parameter. Values of g É < 27.9 mJ/m 2 indicate a hydrophobic surface, which means that epoxy is not a good analog for most geologic materials. This study also explores the use of radio frequency glow discharge plasma to add hydroxyl functionality to polymer surfaces producing a material with alterable surface properties and the same optical and casting properties as epoxy. Using this method, the degree of alteration of the surface chemistry of polymer fracture models can be controlled, allowing the creation of models with a variety of different wettabilities. The resultant models were found to be durable, long lasting, and a potentially very useful alternative to the more typical epoxy models.

No abstract