Background:Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a devastating complication; the optimal prophylactic strategy remains unclear.Methods:We performed a multicentre, retrospective analysis of patients with DLBCL with high risk for CNS relapse as defined by two or more of: multiple extranodal sites, elevated serum LDH and B symptoms or involvement of specific high-risk anatomical sites. We compared three different strategies of CNS-directed therapy: intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (MTX) with (R)-CHOP ‘group 1' R-CHOP with IT MTX and two cycles of high-dose intravenous (IV) MTX ‘group 2' dose-intensive systemic antimetabolite-containing chemotherapy (Hyper-CVAD or CODOXM/IVAC) with IT/IV MTX ‘group 3'.Results:Overall, 217 patients were identified (49, 125 and 43 in groups 1–3, respectively). With median follow-up of 3.4 (range 0.2–18.6) years, 23 CNS relapses occurred (12, 10 and 1 in groups 1–3 respectively). The 3-year actuarial rates (95% CI) of CNS relapse were 18.4% (9.5–33.1%), 6.9% (3.5–13.4%) and 2.3% (0.4–15.4%) in groups 1–3, respectively (P=0.009).Conclusions:The addition of high-dose IV MTX and/or cytarabine was associated with lower incidence of CNS relapse compared with IT chemotherapy alone. However, these data are limited by their retrospective nature and warrant confirmation in prospective randomised studies.

Fludarabine combination chemotherapy achieves high response rates in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and indolent lymphoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of treatment-related myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia (t-MDS/AML) after treatment with fludarabine in combination for lymphoproliferative disorders and identify risk factors for its development. In all, 176 patients treated with fludarabine combination were followed for a median of 41 months (range 6-125 months). In all, 19 cases of t-MDS/AML have been identified for an overall rate of 10.8%. Median overall survival post-t-MDS/AML diagnosis was 11 months. Patients developing t-MDS/AML included 11/54 with follicular lymphoma (FL) (crude rate 20.4%), 5/82 with CLL (6.1%) and 3/24 with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia or marginal zone lymphoma (12.5%). Most patients had other cytotoxic treatments (median 4, range 0-7) but three with FL had fludarabine combination as their only line of treatment. Of the eleven patients (6.3%) who received mitoxantrone with their first fludarabine combination, four (36.4%) developed t-MDS/AML (P ¼ 0.007). There was a trend toward prior cytotoxic therapy increasing the risk for t-MDS/AML (P ¼ 0.067). Fludarabine combination chemotherapy is associated with a moderate risk of t-MDS/AML particularly when combined with mitoxantrone. This complication should be considered when evaluating the potential benefit of this treatment in lymphoproliferative disorders.

Although multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, considerable improvements in survival have been made with the introduction of autologous stem cell transplantation and new drugs. Central nervous system (CNS) MM is a rare complication associated with poor survival. Historically, CNS disease developed early in the course of MM; however recently, patients often present with CNS disease following multiple lines of therapy. It is hypothesized that exposure to novel agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib) changes the natural history of MM, increasing the lifetime risk of CNS disease. We analysed the baseline characteristics, treatment and outcome data of patients who presented with CNS MM at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre between 2001 and 2010. Seven patients were identified, from 2005 onwards. All patients were Durie-Salmon stage IIIA or IIIB and International Staging System Scores I to III at baseline. All had received at least three lines of therapy, including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation and a novel agent, prior to developing CNS MM. Median time from diagnosis to CNS disease was 24 months (range 10-42). All patients died after developing CNS disease with median survival post-CNS disease of 2 months (range 1-23). The incidence of CNS MM is increasing, and time to development of CNS manifestations is prolonging, associated with increased use of high-dose chemotherapy and novel agents. Whether this is due to improved overall survival or specific characteristics of these therapies is not clear. Despite the availability of novel agents, survival after CNS MM remains poor.

BACKGROUNDThe combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FC‐R) shows significant in vitro synergism and may improve patient outcome with little overlapping toxicity.METHODSBetween December 2000 and June 2005, 77 patients completed therapy after a median of 4 cycles of FC‐R (fludarabine at a dose of 25 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on Days 1–3, cyclophosphamide at a dose of 250 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1–3, and rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on Day 1). The median age of the patients was 59 years, 65% were male; 31% had previously untreated disease; and 44% had chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 29% had follicular lymphoma, and 27% other indolent lymphoid malignancies. In addition to standard disease response criteria, patients underwent evaluation using flow cytometric and/or molecular studies.RESULTSObjective responses (OR) and complete responses (CR) were observed in 83% and 42%, respectively, of evaluable patients (n = 76), respectively. For patients with CLL, the respective OR and CR rates were 100% and 67% as firstline therapy, and 95% and 14% as salvage therapy. For patients with follicular lymphoma, the respective OR and CR rates were 100% and 86% as firstline therapy, and 87% and 67% as salvage therapy. Responders who had no detectable disease on flow cytometric and/or molecular studies experienced prolonged remissions with no recurrences reported at a median 25 months of follow‐up. Peripheral stem cell collection using stem cell factor plus granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor was successful in 10 of 13 patients who underwent mobilization (77%).CONCLUSIONSFC‐R is highly active as initial or salvage therapy in patients with CLL or indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. Collection of autologous stem cells during molecular remission is feasible and may facilitate future exploration of high‐dose therapy in these patients. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

High-dose therapy (HDT) for non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM) is considered a feasible option for patients aged 60 years. This study compared the outcomes for all patients aged 60 years treated with HDT at the center to a matched cohort group aged <60 years. Results for patients who were 60 years at HDT between 1997--2002 were retrospectively analysed to assess efficacy and safety. Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared with a cohort group, matched by disease type, chemotherapy sensitivity, year of treatment and conditioning regimen. Patients with NHL were also matched by International Prognostic Index score. Forty patients aged 60 years were identified. Median age was 65 (range 60--76) with 22 MM and 18 NHL; 50% had 1 or more co-morbidity; 35% had cardiovascular co-morbidity vs. 18% of controls (p=0.075). Response rates (RR) following HDT for MM were: 4 (18%) complete responses (CR) and 18 (82%) partial responses (PR), giving an overall response rate (ORR) of 100%, vs. 77% for controls (p=0.02). For NHL patients there were: 8 CR (44%) and 4 PR (22%), giving an ORR of 67%, vs. 83% for controls (p=0.3). Transplant-related mortality was 8% compared to 5% in controls (p=0.6). Toxicities were similar with the exception of cardiac toxicity, which was significantly higher in patients aged 60 years vs. controls (50% grade 3 vs. 10%: p<0.0001). Atrial fibrillation was the most frequent cardiovascular toxicity (9 patients). At a median follow-up of 33 months, there is no significant difference between older vs. younger patients in median EFS (24 vs. 38 months: p=0.78) or OS (40 months vs. not reached: p=0.23). HDT is feasible and effective in selected patients 60 years with MM and NHL. Patients 60 years are more susceptible to cardiovascular toxicities, particularly atrial fibrillation, but have similar or better response rates following HDT and similar long-term outcomes to younger patients.