No abstract

No abstract

Upregulation of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) has been proposed as an adaptive mechanism protecting against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. We investigated HO-1 expression in 38 human liver transplants and correlated this with I/R injury and graft function. Before transplantation, median HO-1 mRNA levels were 3.4-fold higher (range: 0.7-9.3) in donors than in normal controls. Based on the median value, livers were divided into two groups: low and high HO-1 expression. These groups had similar donor characteristics, donor serum transaminases, cold ischemia time, HSP-70 expression and the distribution of HO-1 promoter polymorphism. After reperfusion, HO-1 expression increased significantly further in the initial low HO-1 expression group, but not in the high HO-1 group. Postoperatively, serum transaminases were significantly lower and the bile salt secretion was higher in the initial low HO-1 group, compared to the high expression group. Immunofluorescence staining identified Kupffer cells as the main localization of HO-1.In conclusion, human livers with initial low HO-1 expression (<3.4 times controls) are able to induce HO-1 further during reperfusion and are associated with less injury and better function than initial high HO-1 expression (>3.4 times controls). These data suggest that an increase in HO-1 during transplantation is more protective than high HO-1 expression before transplantation.Key words: Cytoprotection, heme-oxygenase-1, ischemia/reperfusion injury, liver transplantation Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AUC, area under the curve; CO, carbon monoxide; GGT, gamma glutamyltransferase; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; HSP-70, heat shock protein-70; I/R injury, ischemia/reperfusion injury; mRNA, messenger ribonucleicacids; OLT, orthotopic liver transplantation; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava. A comparison of conventional and piggyback techniques in adults Conventional orthotopic liver transplantation (CON-OLT) with resection of the native liver of the recipient together with the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) and interposition of the donor IVC attached to the new graft, has been the most common surgical approach in liver transplantation Miyamoto S, Polak WG, Geuken E, Peeters PMJG, de Jong KP, Porte RJ, van den Berg AP, Hendriks HG, Slooff MJH. Liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava. A comparison of conventional and piggyback techniques in adults.Abstract: The aim of this study is to analyse a single centre's experience with two techniques of liver transplantation (OLT), conventional (CON-OLT) and piggyback (PB-ES), and to compare outcome in terms of survival, morbidity, mortality and post-operative liver function as well as operative characteristics. A consecutive series (1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000) of 167 adult primary OLT were analysed. Ninety-six patients had CON-OLT and 71 patients had PB-ES. In PB-ES group two revascularization protocols were used. In the first protocol reperfusion of the graft was performed first via the portal vein followed by the arterial anastomosis (PB-seq). In the second protocol the graft was reperfused simultaneously via portal vein and hepatic artery (PB-sim). One-, 3-and 5-yr patient survival in the CON-OLT and PB-ES groups were 90, 83 and 80%, and 83, 78 and 78%, respectively (p ¼ ns). Graft survival at the same time points was 81, 73 and 69%, and 78, 69 and 65%, respectively (p ¼ ns). Apart from the higher number of patients with cholangitis and sepsis in CON-OLT group, morbidity, retransplantation rate and post-operative liver and kidney function were not different between the two groups. The total operation time was not different between both groups (9.4 h in PB-ES vs. 10.0 h in CON-OLT), but in PB-ES group cold and warm ischaemia time (CIT and WIT), revascularization time (REVT), functional and anatomic anhepatic phases (FAHP and AAHP) were significantly shorter (8.9 h vs. 10.7 h, 54 min vs. 63 min, 82 min vs. 114 min, 118 min vs. 160 min and 87 min vs. 114 min, respectively, p < 0.05). RBC use in the PB-ES group was lower compared to the CON-OLT group (4.0 min vs. 10.0 units, p < 0.05). Except for WIT and REVT there were no differences in operative characteristics between PB-Sim and PB-Seq groups. The WIT was significantly longer in PB-Sim group compared with PB-Seq group (64 min vs. 50 min, p < 0.05); however REVT was significantly shorter in PB-Sim group (64 min vs. 97 min, p < 0.05). Results of this study show that both techniques are comparable in survival and morbidity; however PB-ES results in shorter AAHP, FAHP, REVT and WIT as well as less RBC use. In the PB-ES group there seems to be no adavantage for any of the revascularization protocols.