Quality of life is increasingly recognized as an important health outcome in people with surgically treatable conditions. However, few data are available on children with oral clefts. Focus groups provide a rich exploratory approach to understanding health-related quality of life issues. We report findings from 2 focus groups of parents of children with oral clefts (cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate) in Utah and Idaho. Participants were guided into a discussion of issues and drivers of quality of life, from diagnosis through treatment to school entry. Parents identified crucial factors including the early need for support (including parent support groups), for credible information, and for advice for daily life. Surgery was a major factor affecting satisfaction and quality of life, and satisfaction depended not only on surgical results but importantly on communication, empathy, expectations, postsurgical care, and discharge management. Many parents underscored as critically important the preparation and the postsurgery experience, rather than the surgery itself. Parents also identified crucial milestones, including birth, diagnosis, the first surgery, and school entry. Combining these crucial issues with a life-stage approach provides a framework for intervention that focuses on drivers of quality of life at selected milestones in the life of children with oral clefts.

Objective: To assess risk factors for oronasal fistula, including 2-stage palate repair. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Tertiary children’s hospital. Patients: Patients with non-submucosal cleft palate whose entire cleft repair was completed at the study hospital between 2005 and 2013 with postsurgical follow-up. Interventions: Hierarchical binary logistic regression assessed predictive value of variables for fistula. Variables tested for inclusion were 2 stage repair, Veau classification, sex, age at surgery 1, age at surgery 2, surgeon volume, surgeon, insurance status, socioeconomic status, and syndrome. Variables were added to the model in order of significance and retained if significant at a .05 level. Main Outcome Measure: Postoperative fistula. Results: Of 584 palate repairs, 505 (87%) had follow-up, with an overall fistula rate of 10.1% (n = 51). Among single-stage repairs (n = 211), the fistula rate was 6.7%; it was 12.6% in 2-stage repairs (n = 294, P = .03). In the final model utilizing both single-stage and 2-stage patient data, significant predictors of fistula were 2-stage repair (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5, P = .012), surgeon volume, and surgeon. When examining only single-stage patients, higher surgeon volume was protective against fistula. In the model examining 2-stage patients, surgeon and age at hard palate repair were significant; older age at hard palate closure was protective for fistula, with an OR of 0.82 ( P = .046) for each additional 6 months in age at repair. Conclusions: Two-stage surgery, surgeon, and surgeon volume were significant predictors of fistula occurrence in all children, and older age at hard palate repair was protective in those with 2-stage repair.

In the treatment of alveolar cleft deformities, operative material costs were greater in the DBX/rhBMP-2 group but-secondary to decreased hospital, anesthesia, pharmacy, and operating room costs-DBX/rhBMP-2 was more cost-effective than ICBG.