Pressure represents a clean tuning parameter for traversing the complex phase diagrams of interacting electron systems 1,2 , and as such has proved of key importance in the study of quantum materials. Application of controlled uniaxial pressure has recently been shown to more than double the transition temperature of the unconventional superconductor Sr 2 RuO 4 for example 3-5 , leading to a pronounced peak in T c vs. strain whose origin is still under active debate 4,6,7 . Here, we develop a simple and compact method to apply large uniaxial pressures passively in restricted sample environments, and utilize this to study the evolution of the electronic structure of Sr 2 RuO 4 using angle-resolved photoemission. We directly visualize how uniaxial stress drives a Lifshitz transition of the γ-band Fermi surface, pointing to the key role of strain-tuning its associated van Hove singularity to the Fermi level in mediating the peak in T c 7 . Our measurements provide stringent constraints for theoretical models of the strain-tuned electronic structure evolution of Sr 2 RuO 4 . More generally, our novel experimental approach opens the door to future studies of straintuned phase transitions not only using photoemission, but also other experimental techniques where large pressure cells or piezoelectric-based devices may be difficult to implement.The layered perovskite Sr 2 RuO 4 has been extensively studied both because of its celebrated unconventional superconductivity 5,8-11 and the accuracy with which its normal state properties can be measured 12-15 and analysed [16][17][18][19] . In spite of a quarter of a century of work, there is still no consensus on the symmetry of its superconducting order parameter, or the mechanism by which the superconductivity condenses 5 . This is a major unsolved problem because its electronic structure, which is relatively simple compared to that of many other unconventional superconductors, is now known in considerable detail and its metallic state is firmly established to be a Fermi liquid below approximately 30 K 13 . A full understanding of the Sr 2 RuO 4 problem is therefore a benchmark for the progress of the fields of strongly interacting systems and unconventional superconductivity.
In a recent work devoted to the magnetism of Li 2 CuO 2 , Shu et al (2017 New J. Phys. 19, 023026) have proposed a 'simplified' unfrustrated microscopic model that differs considerably from the models refined through decades of prior work. We show that the proposed model is at odds with known experimental data, including the reported magnetic susceptibility χ(T) data up to 550K. Using an 8th order high-temperature expansion for χ(T), we show that the experimental data for Li 2 CuO 2 are consistent with the prior model derived from inelastic neutron scattering studies. We also establish the T-range of validity for a Curie-Weiss law for the real frustrated magnetic system. We argue that the knowledge of the long-range ordered magnetic structure for T<T N and of χ(T) in a restricted Trange provides insufficient information to extract all of the relevant couplings in frustrated magnets; the saturation field and INS data must also be used to determine several exchange couplings, including the weak but decisive frustrating antiferromagnetic interchain couplings.Li 2 CuO 2 takes a special place among the still increasing family of frustrated chain compounds with edge-sharing CuO 4 plaquettes and a ferromagnetic (FM) nearest neighbor (NN) inchain coupling J 1 [1]. This unique position is due to its ideal planar CuO 2 chain structure and its well-defined ordering characterized by a 3D Neél-type arrangement of adjacent chains whose magnetic moments are aligned ferromagnetically along the chains (b-axis). Li 2 CuO 2 is well studied in both experiment and theory (see e.g. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]) and serves nowadays as a reference system for more complex and structurally less ideal systems. In particular, it is accepted in the quantum magnetism community that the leading FM coupling is the NN inchain coupling J 1 . (J 1 is also dominant but antiferromagnetic (AFM) in the special spin-Peierls case of CuGeO 3 [12].) There is always also a finite frustrating AFM next-nearest neighbor (NNN) coupling J 2 >0, see figure 1, left. This inchain frustration is quantified by J J 2 1 a = | |. In the present case, and in that of the related Ca 2 Y 2 Cu 5 O 10 , there are only frustrating OPEN ACCESS RECEIVED
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.