In this randomized, double-blind trial we evaluated the quality and duration of analgesia and motor effects after caudal block using 1 mL/kg of ropivacaine 0.1% (Group 1), 0.15% (Group 2), 0.175% (Group 3) compared to 0.2% (Group 4) in infants 1-12 mo old. Postoperatively, the number of infants who received pain medication differed among the groups (P < 0.0005). There were more infants in Groups 1 and 2 compared with Group 4 and there was no difference between Groups 3 and 4. In the postanesthesia care unit, infants in Groups 1 and 2 received more pain medication than did those in Group 4 (P = 0.0098). In the day surgery unit, there was a significant difference among the groups (P = 0.0326); infants in Groups 3 and 4 required no pain medication. The analgesia duration differed among the groups (P = 0.034). Infants in Groups 1 and 2 had a shorter duration, and there was no difference between Groups 3 and 4. Infants in Group 4 took longer to regain their motor power compared with those in Group 3 (P = 0.0347). We conclude that in infants, ropivacaine 0.175% provided postoperative analgesia and duration similar to that of ropivacaine 0.2%, whereas ropivacaine 0.1% and 0.15% did not, and it was associated with fewer motor effects.
The superior cavopulmonary anastomosis - bi-directional Glenn - is the standard palliation for single ventricle physiology. When upper body systemic venous anatomic concerns such as superior caval vein stenosis, hypoplasia, or inadequate collateral tributaries are present, a Glenn may be precluded or have a high risk of poor outcome. A primary inferior cavopulmonary connection with an extracardiac conduit is an alternative palliation that provides a generous pathway for pulmonary blood flow, with the additional benefit of including hepatic venous return. We report a case of primary extracardiac inferior cavopulmonary connection in a patient unsuitable for Glenn, with successful post-operative outcome and early follow-up.
Background: Antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) typically is used with deep hypothermia for cerebral protection during aortic arch reconstructions. The impact of ACP on cerebral oxygenation and serum creatinine at a more tepid 25 ℃ was studied in newborns and children.Methods: Between 2010 and 2014, 61 newborns and children (<5 years old) underwent aortic arch reconstruction using moderate hypothermia (25.0±0.9 ℃) with ACP and a pH-stat blood gas management strategy. These included 44% Norwood-type operations, 30% isolated arch reconstructions, and 26% arch reconstructions with other major procedures. Median patient age at surgery was 9 days (range, 3 days-4.7 years). Cerebral oxygenation (NIRS) was monitored continuously perioperatively for 120 hours.Serum creatinine was monitored daily.Results: Median cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross clamp times were 181 minutes (range, 82-652 minutes) and 72 minutes (range, 10-364 minutes), respectively. ACP was performed at a mean flow rate of 46±6 mL/min/kg for a median of 48 minutes (range, 10-123 minutes). Cerebral and somatic NIRS were preserved intraoperatively and remained at baseline postoperatively during the first 120 hours.Peak postoperative serum creatinine levels averaged 0.7±0.3 mg/dL for all patients. There were 4 (6.6%) discharge mortalities. Six patients (9.8%) required ECMO support. Median postoperative length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were 16 days(range, 4-104 days) and 9 days (range, 1-104 days), respectively. Two patients (3.3%) received short-term peritoneal dialysis for fluid removal, and none required hemodialysis. Three patients (4.9%) had an isolated seizure which resolved with medical therapy, and none had a neurologic deficit or stroke.Conclusions: ACP at 25 ℃ preserved perioperative cerebral oxygenation and serum creatinine for newborns and children undergoing arch reconstruction. Early outcomes are encouraging, and additional study is warranted to assess the impact on late outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.