BackgroundIn 2010, the World Health Assembly passed a resolution calling upon countries to prevent birth defects where possible. Though birth defects surveillance programs are an important source of information to guide implementation and evaluation of preventive interventions, many countries that shoulder the largest burden of birth defects do not have surveillance programs. This paper shares the results of a hospital-based birth defects surveillance program in Uganda which, can be adopted by similar resource-limited countries.MethodsAll informative births, including live births, stillbirths and spontaneous abortions; regardless of gestational age, delivered at four selected hospitals in Kampala from August 2015 to December 2017 were examined for birth defects. Demographic data were obtained by midwives through maternal interviews and review of hospital patient notes and entered in an electronic data collection tool. Identified birth defects were confirmed through bedside examination by a physician and review of photographs and a narrative description by a birth defects expert. Informative births (live, still and spontaneous abortions) with a confirmed birth defect were included in the numerator, while the total informative births (live, still and spontaneous abortions) were included in the denominator to estimate the prevalence of birth defects per 10,000 births.ResultsThe overall prevalence of birth defects was 66.2/10,000 births (95% CI 60.5–72.5). The most prevalent birth defects (per 10,000 births) were: Hypospadias, 23.4/10,000 (95% CI 18.9–28.9); Talipes equinovarus, 14.0/10,000 (95% CI 11.5–17.1) and Neural tube defects, 10.3/10,000 (95% CI 8.2–13.0). The least prevalent were: Microcephaly, 1.6/10,000 (95% CI 0.9–2.8); Microtia and Anotia, 1.6/10,000 (95% CI 0.9–2.8) and Imperforate anus, 2.0/10,000 (95% CI 1.2–3.4).ConclusionA hospital-based surveillance project with active case ascertainment can generate reliable epidemiologic data about birth defects prevalence and can inform prevention policies and service provision needs in low and middle-income countries.
Anorectal malformations (ARM) remain a significant birth defect with geographic variation in incidence, individual phenotypes and regional geographic subtypes. Although early studies indicated a low incidence in Black patients, there is a great paucity of knowledge as to the types, frequency and incidence of ARMs encountered in the African continent and their associated anomalies. Current evidence suggests a significant clinical load. This study set out to evaluate ARM in Southern and other parts of Africa to define the clinical load of ARM. We retrospectively collected data on 1,401 ARM patients from six South African Paediatric Surgical units plus representative samples from five other African countries from West, Central and Southern Africa. Data included ethnic group, age, gender as well as the anatomical pathology, classification and presence or absence of associated anomalies. ARM lesions classified by the Wingspread classification plus an analysis of fistula position was carried out in evaluable cases for purposes of comparison. South African centres reported a higher prevalence of cloacae and vestibular fistulae, whereas rectovaginal, recto prostatic and anorectal malformation without fistula were more prevalent in the Northern African group. 76% of 1,401 patients were ethnically Black African [gender ratio = 2 (vs gender ratio 1.38 overall)] and 49.8% were "low" lesions (Wingspread classification). High or intermediate lesions were mostly males (72%). Anal stenosis was most prevalent in black males and non-Black females. Fistulae were identified in 95% with 682 (52%) being low (perineal/covered anus/vestibular) fistulae. Perineal fistulae had a male predilection (n = 260; 20%), whereas vestibular fistulas (n = 416; 32%) was strikingly frequent in black females (55%). Of the remainder, 15 fistulae were rectovesical (1.2%), 544 recto-urethral or prostatic (42%), 16 recto-vaginal (1.2%). In addition, there were 43 cloacal lesions (3.3%). Isolated rare ARM anomalies included "Pouch" colon (2) and H-type fistula (2). Isolated lesions occurred in 81% but 163 associated anomalies were identified in 114 patients. These included chromosomal lesions (10), genito-urinary anomalies (50), genital (16), cardiac (31), skeletal anomalies (33), gastro-intestinal malformations (28). Other anomalies included CNS anomalies (14), anterior abdominal wall defects (2) and facial (8) abnormalities and neuroblastoma (1). The ARM is not uncommon in Black African populations and constitutes a significant clinical load to surgical practice in Africa. Ethnic differences appear to exist and vestibular fistulae predominate in black females. Cloaca (3.3%) did appear to be more prevalent. Isolated lesions are frequent but the types of associated anomalies appear similar to other series except chromosomal syndromes. This study illustrates the need for more objective data from developing countries to assess geographical differences.
BackgroundThe burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is accelerating. Given that the capacity of health systems in LMICs is already strained by the weight of communicable diseases, these countries find themselves facing a double burden of disease. NCDs contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality, thereby playing a major role in the cycle of poverty, and impeding development.MethodsIntegrated approaches to health service delivery and healthcare worker (HCW) training will be necessary in order to successfully combat the great challenge posed by NCDs.ResultsIn 2013, we formed the Uganda Initiative for Integrated Management of NCDs (UINCD), a multidisciplinary research collaboration that aims to present a systems approach to integrated management of chronic disease prevention, care, and the training of HCWs.DiscussionThrough broad-based stakeholder engagement, catalytic partnerships, and a collective vision, UINCD is working to reframe integrated health service delivery in Uganda.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.