Composite specimens with resin contents of 33.5%, 35.4%, and 35.9%, respectively, were manufactured by controlling the type of subsidiary material used in the bagging process for a composite material having the same composition.The effect of controlling the resin content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of composite specimens was investigated. The flow of resin and air during the cure process was inferred and explained by connecting it with the microstructure. Specifically, the behavior of the resin determined the thickness, density, and void of the composite laminate, which acted as a factor causing the difference in mechanical properties of the composite materials. As the resin content increased, there was no significant difference in tensile strength, but Young's modulus decreased. In the case of the compression test, there was a difference in mechanical properties due to the combined effect of the reinforcement and the resin. The maximum compressive strength value was shown in the process with low void content, and Young's modulus tended to decrease as the resin content increased. In the bagging process, the subsidiary material controlled the flow of resin and air, and caused a difference in microstructure, affecting the change of mechanical properties.
The field of application of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer expands as well as the size of the component where composite material is applied. Due to the size limitation of the prepreg used, it is difficult to apply 1ply to large parts. Many studies have been reported on the bolt joint that assembles parts and parts for the joint area, butt and overlap design for joining dissimilar materials, and mechanical properties. Although the mechanical properties of the joint areas are important, studies on the microstructure are also needed. In this study, the microstructure was observed by controlling the type of subsidiary materials in the bagging process by applying prepregs of the same composition. It was found that the air and resin flow inside the prepreg acted differently depending on the type of subsidiary material. The flow of resin during curing was inferred from the influence of subsidiary materials and explained by connecting it with the microstructure. The behavior of the resin determined thickness, resin, and void contents of the composite. This flow affects voids in the joint area, causing differences in microstructure and mechanical properties. There was no significant difference in the tensile strength of the laminate specimens manufactured according to the process, but the minimum strength was found in the specimens containing many void contents. The joint specimen showed a decrease in strength as the void content increased. It was discussed that this reduced the adhesive force of the specimen due to the effect of the void generated in the joint area.
(Pb, La)(Zr, Ti)O3 (PLZT) with antiferroelectric properties can be applied as a capacitor whose capacitance increases in a high electric field. From this, we obtained a high sintering density at 950 °C by adding low-temperature sintering additives, 8.0 wt% of PbO and 2.5 wt% of ZnO, simultaneously to a (Pb0.88, La0.12)(Zr0.86, Ti0.14)O3 composition. The change in electrical characteristics was confirmed in terms of Sn4+ substitution, resulting in no change in the sintering density by Sn4+ substitution. However, as the amount of Sn4+ substitution increases, the dielectric constant gradually decreases from 1300 to 700, and the grain size decreases from about 4 to 1 µm in terms of microstructure. In the crystal structure analysis, the general formation of a single perovskite structure was confirmed. The results of the hysteresis curve measurement revealed that the breakdown electric field increases from 4 to 9 kV·mm−1 as the amount of Sn4+ substitution gradually increases. However, polarization decreases in the same way as the permittivity trend. The composition exhibits excellent electrical properties when the ratio of Sn4+ is 0.4: a high energy storage density of 3.5 J·cm−3, energy efficiency of 80%, and breakdown electric field of about 8.5 kV·mm−1.
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) is widely used as aerospace material requiring high specific strength, specific stiffness, and excellent mechanical and chemical properties. To apply the already approved composite materials to other processes, an equivalency test that compares the mechanical properties of the composite materials based on the database is required. For the successful completion of the equivalency test, it is important to control the factors affecting the mechanical properties. The resin content and density of the specimens are manufactured differently according to the process. The effect of these factors on the change of mechanical properties required for equivalency qualification has not been sufficiently reported. In this study, an equivalency test was performed on the GFRP applied to the aircraft radome based on the procedure of the equivalency test and acceptance test proposed by the National Center for Advanced Materials Performance. The causes of problems occurring between equivalency tests were analyzed. It was confirmed that the resin content, density, and voids of the specimen affect the mechanical properties. As the resin content decreases, the density and voids were controlled, and it was confirmed that the average strength and modulus increase by 13.12 and 6.78%, respectively. The equivalency qualification was completed by applying an improved process in which these factors were controlled.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.