BackgroundMalondialdehyde (MDA) is generated during lipid peroxidation as in oxidized low‐density lipoprotein, but antibodies against oxidized low‐density lipoprotein show variable results in clinical studies. We therefore studied the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with IgM antibodies against MDA conjugated with human albumin (anti‐MDA).Methods and ResultsIn a 5‐ to 7‐year follow‐up of 60‐year‐old men and women from Stockholm County previously screened for cardiovascular risk factors (2039 men, 2193 women), 209 incident CVD cases (defined as new events of coronary heart disease, fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hospitalization for angina pectoris) and 620 age‐ and sex‐matched controls were tested for IgM anti‐MDA by ELISA. Antibody peptide/protein characterization was done using a proteomics de novo sequencing approach. After adjustment for smoking, body‐mass index, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, an increased CVD risk was observed in the low IgM anti‐MDA percentiles (below 10th and 25th) (odds ratio and 95% CI: 2.0; 1.19–3.36 and 1.67; 1.16–2.41, respectively). Anti‐MDA above the 66th percentile was associated with a decreased CVD risk (odds ratio 0.68; CI: 0.48–0.98). After stratification by sex, associations were only present among men. IgM anti‐MDA levels were lower among cases (median [interquartile range]: 141.0 [112.7–164.3] versus 147.4 [123.5–169.6]; P=0.0177), even more so among men (130.6 [107.7–155.3] versus 143.0 [120.1–165.2]; P=0.001). The IgM anti‐MDA variable region profiles are distinctly different and also more homologous in their content (correlates strongly with fewer peptides) than control antibodies (not binding MDA).ConclusionsIgM anti‐MDA is a protection marker for CVD. This finding could have diagnostic and therapeutic implications.
Background and Aims Genetically modified mice have been used extensively to study human disease. However, the data gained are not always translatable to humans because of major species differences. Liver‐humanized mice (LHM) are considered a promising model to study human hepatic and systemic metabolism. Therefore, we aimed to further explore their lipoprotein metabolism and to characterize key hepatic species‐related, physiological differences. Approach and Results Fah−/−, Rag2−/−, and Il2rg−/− knockout mice on the nonobese diabetic (FRGN) background were repopulated with primary human hepatocytes from different donors. Cholesterol lipoprotein profiles of LHM showed a human‐like pattern, characterized by a high ratio of low‐density lipoprotein to high‐density lipoprotein, and dependency on the human donor. This pattern was determined by a higher level of apolipoprotein B100 in circulation, as a result of lower hepatic mRNA editing and low‐density lipoprotein receptor expression, and higher levels of circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. As a consequence, LHM lipoproteins bind to human aortic proteoglycans in a pattern similar to human lipoproteins. Unexpectedly, cholesteryl ester transfer protein was not required to determine the human‐like cholesterol lipoprotein profile. Moreover, LHM treated with GW3965 mimicked the negative lipid outcomes of the first human trial of liver X receptor stimulation (i.e., a dramatic increase of cholesterol and triglycerides in circulation). Innovatively, LHM allowed the characterization of these effects at a molecular level. Conclusions LHM represent an interesting translatable model of human hepatic and lipoprotein metabolism. Because several metabolic parameters displayed donor dependency, LHM may also be used in studies for personalized medicine.
Objective Immunoglobulin M antibodies against phosphorylcholine (anti‐PCs) may be protective in atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We study immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2) anti‐PCs, with a focus on atherosclerosis and SLE. Methods We determined anti‐PCs by using the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in 116 patients with SLE and 110 age‐ and sex‐matched controls. For functional studies, we used three in‐house–generated, fully human monoclonal IgG1 anti‐PCs (A01, D05, and E01). Apoptosis was induced in Jurkat T cells and preincubated with A01, D05, E01, or IgG1 isotype control, and effects on efferocytosis by human macrophages were studied. Anti‐PC peptide/protein characterization was determined using a proteomics de novo sequencing approach. Results IgG1, but not IgG2, anti‐PC levels were higher among patients with SLE (P = 0.02). IgG1 anti‐PCs were negatively associated with Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) damage index and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores (odds ratio [OR]: 2.978 [confidence interval (CI): 0.876‐10.098] and OR: 5.108 [CI 1.3‐20.067], respectively) and negatively associated with CVD, atherosclerotic plaques, and echolucent plaques (potentially vulnerable plaques), but the association for the two former was not significant after controlling for confounders. D05 had a maximum effect on macrophage efferocytosis efficiency, followed by A01 and E01. The monoclonal antibodies showed differential binding specificity to PC and PC‐associated neoepitopes. A peptide analysis showed a difference in the complementarity‐determining region 3 of the three IgG1 anti‐PC clones that are crucial for recognition of PC on apoptotic cell surfaces and other neoepitopes. Conclusion IgG1 anti‐PCs are negatively associated with disease activity and disease damage in SLE, but the negative association with CVD is also dependent on confounding risk factors. One potential underlying mechanism could be increased clearance of dead cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.