Nanomedicines achieve tumor-targeted delivery mainly through enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect following intravenous (IV) administration. Unfortunately, the EPR effect is severely compromised in pancreatic cancer due to hypovascularity and dense desmoplastic stroma. Intraperitoneal (IP) administration may be an effective EPR-independent local delivery approach to target peritoneal tumors. Besides improved delivery, effective combination delivery strategies are needed to improve pancreatic cancer therapy by targeting both cancer cells and cellular interactions within the tumor stroma. Here, we described simple cholesterol-modified polymeric CXCR4 antagonist (PCX) nanoparticles (to block cancer-stroma interactions) for codelivery of anti-miR-210 (to inactivate stroma-producing pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs)) and siKRAS G12D (to kill pancreatic cancer cells). IP administration delivered the nanoparticles to an orthotopic syngeneic pancreatic tumors as a result of preferential localization to the tumors and metastases with disrupted mesothelium and effective tumor penetration. The local IP delivery resulted in nearly 15-fold higher tumor accumulation than delivery by IV injection. Through antagonism of CXCR4 and downregulation of miR-210/KRAS G12D , the triple-action nanoparticles favorably modulated desmoplastic tumor microenvironment via inactivating PSCs and promoting the infiltration of cytotoxic T cells. The combined therapy displayed improved therapeutic effect when compared with individual therapies as documented by the delayed tumor growth, depletion of stroma, reduction of immunosuppression, inhibition of metastasis, and prolonged survival. Overall, we present data that a local IP delivery of a miRNA/siRNA combination holds the potential to improve pancreatic cancer therapy.

No abstract

No abstract

Breast cancer remains the most prevalent cancer in women with limited treatment options for patients suffering from therapy-resistance and metastatic disease. Neutrophils play an important role in breast cancer progression and metastasis. We examined the pro-tumorigenic nature of the breast cancer cell–neutrophil interactions and delineated the differences in neutrophil properties between the chemotherapy-resistant and the parent tumor microenvironment. Our data demonstrated that high neutrophil infiltration is associated with disease aggressiveness and therapy resistance. In the human breast cancer dataset, expression of neutrophil-related signature gene expression was higher in tumors from therapy-resistant patients than therapy-sensitive patients. We observed that breast cancer-derived factors significantly enhanced neutrophil survival, polarization, and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. Breast cancer cell-derived supernatant treated neutrophils significantly expressed high levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), CC-chemokine ligand-2-4 (CCL2, CCL3, CCL4), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and matrix metallopeptidase-9 (MMP9), and formed extracellular traps (NETs). Moreover, neutrophils showed increased secretion of MMP9 when cultured with the supernatant of chemotherapy-resistant Cl66-Doxorubicin (Cl66-Dox) and Cl66-Paclitaxel (Cl66-Pac) cells in comparison with the supernatant of Cl66-parent cells. Together, these data suggest an important role of breast cancer cell–neutrophil interactions in regulating pro-tumor characteristics in neutrophils and its modulation by therapy resistance.

Background Several reports have shown the role of glycosylation in pancreatic cancer (PC), but a global systematic screening of specific glycosyltransferases (glycoTs) in its progression remains unknown. Methods We demonstrate a rigorous top-down approach using TCGA-based RNA-Seq analysis, multi-step validation using RT-qPCR, immunoblots and immunohistochemistry. We identified six unique glycoTs (B3GNT3, B4GALNT3, FUT3, FUT6, GCNT3 and MGAT3) in PC pathogenesis and studied their function using CRISPR/Cas9-based KD systems. Results Serial metastatic in vitro models using T3M4 and HPAF/CD18, generated in house, exhibited decreases in B3GNT3, FUT3 and GCNT3 expression on increasing metastatic potential. Immunohistochemistry identified clinical significance for GCNT3, B4GALNT3 and MGAT3 in PC. Furthermore, the effects of B3GNT3, FUT3, GCNT3 and MGAT3 were shown on proliferation, migration, EMT and stem cell markers in CD18 cell line. Talniflumate, GCNT3 inhibitor, reduced colony formation and migration in T3M4 and CD18 cells. Moreover, we found that loss of GCNT3 suppresses PC progression and metastasis by downregulating cell cycle genes and β-catenin/MUC4 axis. For GCNT3, proteomics revealed downregulation of MUC5AC, MUC1, MUC5B including many other proteins. Conclusions Collectively, we demonstrate a critical role of O- and N-linked glycoTs in PC progression and delineate the mechanism encompassing the role of GCNT3 in PC.