The identity of the dominant microbial symbionts in a forest determines the ability 70 of trees to access limiting nutrients from atmospheric or soil pools 1,2 , sequester 71 carbon 3,4 and withstand the impacts of climate change 1-7 . Characterizing the global 72 distribution of symbioses, and identifying the factors that control it, are thus integral to 73 understanding present and future forest ecosystem functioning. Here we generate the first 74 spatially explicit map of forest symbiotic status using a global database of 1.2 million forest 75 inventory plots with over 28,000 tree species. Our analyses indicate that climatic variables, 76 and in particular climatically-controlled variation in decomposition rate, are the primary 77 drivers of the global distribution of major symbioses. We estimate that ectomycorrhizal 78 (EM) trees, which represent only 2% of all plant species 8 , constitute approximately 60% of 79 tree stems on Earth. EM symbiosis dominates forests where seasonally cold and dry 80
Soil organisms are a crucial part of the terrestrial biosphere. Despite their importance for ecosystem functioning, no quantitative, spatially-explicit models of the active belowground community currently exist. In particular, nematodes are the most abundant animals on Earth, filling all trophic levels in the soil food web. Here, we use 6,579 georeferenced samples to generate a mechanistic understanding of the patterns of global soil nematode abundance and functional group composition. The resulting maps show that 4.4 ± 0.64 10 20 nematodes (total biomass ~0.3 Gt) inhabit surface soils across the world, with higher abundances in sub-arctic regions (38% of total), than in temperate (24%), or tropical regions (21%). Regional variations in these global trends also provide insights into local patterns of soil fertility and functioning. These high-resolution models provide the first steps towards representing soil ecological processes into global biogeochemical models, to predict elemental cycling under current and future climate scenarios.
Regrowing natural forests is a prominent natural climate solution, but accurate assessments of its potential are limited by uncertainty and variability around carbon accumulation rates. To assess why and where rates differ, we compiled 13,112 georeferenced measurements of carbon accumulation. Climate explained variation in rates better than land use history, so we combined field data with 66 environmental covariate layers to create a global, 1-km resolution map of potential aboveground carbon accumulation rates for the first 30 years of forest regrowth. Our results indicate that on average default forest regrowth rates from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are underestimated by 32% and miss 8-fold variation within ecozones.Conversely, we conclude that previously reported maximum climate mitigation potential from natural forest regrowth is overestimated by 11% due to the use of overly high rates. Our results therefore provide a much needed and globally consistent method for assessing natural forest regrowth as a climate mitigation strategy. BackgroundTo constrain global warming, we must reduce emissions and capture excess carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere 1,2 . Restoring forest cover, defined here as the transition from < 25% tree cover to > 25% tree cover where forests historically occurred, is a promising option for additional carbon capture 3 and has been prioritized in many national and international goals 4,5 . It is deployable, scalable, and provides important biodiversity and ecosystem services 6 . Yet the magnitude and distribution of climate mitigation opportunity from restoring forest cover is poorly described, with large confidence intervals around estimates 2,3 . To evaluate the appropriateness of forest cover restoration for climate mitigation, compared to the multitude of other potential climate mitigation actions, countries, corporations, and multilateral entities need more accurate assessments of its potential 7 .Mitigation potential from restoring forest cover (reported here in terms of MgCO2 yr -1 ) is determined by the potential extent and location of new forest ("area of opportunity") and the rate at which those forests remove atmospheric CO2 (reported here in terms of MgC ha -1 yr -1 ). While there are now multiple estimates of area of opportunity based on diverse and often heavily debated criteria (e.g., references 3,8-11 ), we lack spatially explicit and globally comprehensive estimates of accumulation rates. This is especially true for natural forest regrowth, defined here as the recovery of forest cover on deforested lands through spontaneous regrowth after cessation of prior disturbance or land use. Many countries do not have nationally specific forest carbon accumulation rates and instead rely on default rates from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 12,13 . Although these rates were recently updated 8,12 , they nonetheless represent coarse estimates based on continent and ecological zone, and do not account for finer scale variation in rates due to mor...
Soil organisms provide crucial ecosystem services that support human life. However, little is known about their diversity, distribution, and the threats affecting them. Here, we compiled a global dataset of 60 sampled earthworm communities from over 7000 sites in 56 countries to predict patterns in earthworm diversity, abundance, and biomass. We identify the environmental drivers shaping these patterns. Local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, while biomass peaked in the tropics, patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms. Similar to many aboveground taxa, climate variables were more important in shaping earthworm communities than soil properties or habitat 65 cover. These findings highlight that, while the environmental drivers are similar, conservation strategies to conserve aboveground biodiversity might not be appropriate for earthworm diversity, especially in a changing climate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.