A method was developed for evaluating outcomes of nursing care in complex situations such as care of people who are dying. Positive outcomes of care for patients that were directly attributable to the care provided by Macmillan specialist palliative care nurses were found for the majority of patients. For a small number of patients, negative outcomes of care were identified.

Further support and training may improve confidence and positive experiences in relation to DNAR decision-making among training-grade doctors in the UK.

The remit and boundaries of the Macmillan Nursing role in the UK have been called into question recently by a number of policy-driven changes. The rapid appointment of tumour site-specific nurses and the development of posts for palliative medicine, stemming originally from the Calman-Hine recommendations for reorganizing cancer services, have created unparalleled challenges of adaptation to new working practices and procedures. The extent to which Macmillan Nurses are adapting to these new demands was addressed as part of a major evaluation study of UK Macmillan Nursing in 12 sites commissioned by the UK charity Macmillan Cancer Relief. This paper draws upon semi-structured interviews with Macmillan Nurses (n = 44) and their key colleagues (n = 47). We found that differences of expectation between Macmillan Nurses and their managers about the appropriate focus of their work lead to problems of role ambiguity and role conflict; that Macmillan Nurses lack resources with which to develop an educative and consultative role and yet substitute for inadequacies in skills and knowledge of other health care staff; and that problems are associated in co-working with newly appointed cancer site-specific nurses and palliative medicine colleagues. Macmillan Nursing has a crucial role to play in meeting the objectives in the NHS Cancer Plan. However, in order to ensure that their expertise is used efficiently and effectively, there is an urgent need to clarify the nature and scope of the Macmillan Nurse role, to attend to issues of team working and to improve the skills of nonspecialist staff in palliative care.

Macmillan Nurses play a significant role in specialist palliative care services in the UK, providing direct and indirect services to patients with complex palliative care needs and to their families. Existing literature shows a developing understanding of the role; however, little detailed data exist regarding the clinical work that they undertake. This paper provides evidence from a major evaluation study, commissioned by Macmillan Cancer Relief. It reports the methods of data collection for the study and then goes on to use data from the evaluation to describe the caseload of Macmillan Nurses. Between September 1998 and October 1999, a team of researchers worked alongside 12 Macmillan teams for a period of 8 weeks with each team. Prospective data were gathered on all new referrals to the services within the 8-week period. This included demographic details, timing of referral, the nature and purpose of contacts, and interventions, recorded from case notes and Macmillan Nurse records. Where possible, a date of death was obtained for all patients. A total of 814 new patients were referred during the study period (range 45-114 per site). The most common reasons for referral were emotional care for the patient (57%), pain control (27%), and other physical symptoms (33%). Thirteen per cent of the patients referred to the services died within 1 week of referral while 40% died within 6 weeks; thus, a significant proportion of patient work is focused on care at the end of life. It is also noteworthy that one-third of patients were still alive, indicating that some patients are being cared for earlier in the illness trajectory. On average, each new patient referral received two or more 'face-to-face' visits and two follow-up phone calls within the 8-week period. It would appear that Macmillan Nurse teams have been successful in getting access to relevant patients. As with any service that provides a complex set of interventions, the Macmillan teams have to adapt and develop the services in each setting. Whilst it is clearly important for the development of a Macmillan service to be tailored to the local conditions, the evidence on diversity suggests that in some cases, stronger guidance, in partnership with both Macmillan Cancer Relief and core providers, may be justified.