In mammals, the increased secretion of arginine-vasopressin (AVP) (antidiuretic hormone) and oxytocin (natriuretic hormone) is a key physiological response to hyperosmotic stress. In this study, we examined whether chronic hyperosmotic stress weakens GABA A receptor-mediated synaptic inhibition in rat hypothalamic magnocellular neurosecretory cells (MNCs) secreting these hormones. Gramicidin-perforated recordings of MNCs in acute hypothalamic slices prepared from control rats and ones subjected to the chronic hyperosmotic stress revealed that this challenge not only attenuated the GABAergic inhibition but actually converted it into excitation. The hyperosmotic stress caused a profound depolarizing shift in the reversal potential of GABAergic response (E GABA ) in MNCs. This E GABA shift was associated with increased expression of NaϪ cotransporter 1 (NKCC1) in MNCs and was blocked by the NKCC inhibitor bumetanide as well as by decreasing NKCC activity through a reduction of extracellular sodium. Blocking central oxytocin receptors during the hyperosmotic stress prevented the switch to GABAergic excitation. Finally, intravenous injection of the GABA A receptor antagonist bicuculline lowered the plasma levels of AVP and oxytocin in rats under the chronic hyperosmotic stress. We conclude that the GABAergic responses of MNCs switch between inhibition and excitation in response to physiological needs through the regulation of transmembrane Cl Ϫ gradients.
BackgroundWe evaluated the outcomes of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) who underwent transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the perioperative outcomes of 200 patients (170 women and 30 men) with PTC who underwent TORT at a single center between March 2016 and February 2018.ResultsThere were 182 and 13 cases of lobectomy and total thyroidectomy, respectively, with corresponding mean operative times of 200.6 ± 31.2 and 265.7 ± 63.0 minutes. On average, 5.6 ± 3.45 lymph nodes were retrieved per patient. There were 12 cases of perioperative morbidity. No conversion to endoscopic or conventional open surgery was noted. In a subgroup analysis for predictors of difficult TORT, patient sex was the only factor showing a significant operative time difference between a difficult and a nondifficult thyroidectomy.ConclusionTORT can be performed safely in patients with PTC without serious complications.
PurposeAn oxaliplatin-based regimen is the most common adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer, but many patients experience dose reduction or early termination of chemotherapy due to side effects. We conducted this study to verify the range of reduction with oncologic safety.MethodsPatients with stage II/III colorectal cancer who received adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. The total amount of oxaliplatin administered per patient was calculated as a percentile based on 12 cycles of full-dose FOLFOX as a standard dose. The cutoff values showing significant differences in survival were calculated, and the clinicopathologic outcomes of patient groups classified by the value were compared.ResultsAmong a total of 611 patients, there were 107 stage II patients, and 504 stage III patients. At 60% of the standard dose of oxaliplatin, the patients in the dose reduction group were older (62 years vs. 58 years, P = 0.003), had lower body mass index (BMI) (23.1 kg/m2 vs. 24.0 kg/m2, P = 0.005), and were more exposed to neoadjuvant treatment (18.0% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.003) in comparison to the standard group. At 60% of the standard dose, there were no significant differences in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups (5-year DFS: 73.5% vs. 74.2%, P = 0.519; 5-year OS: 71.9% vs. 81.5%, P = 0.256, respectively).ConclusionPatients with old age, low BMI, and more frequent exposure to neoadjuvant treatment tended to show lower compliance with chemotherapy. More than 60% dose should be administered to patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer as adjuvant chemotherapy to achieve acceptable oncologic outcomes.
Objectives/Hypothesis: Obesity is an increasing health concern worldwide. It has been associated with perioperative complications that could affect patient outcomes. Our aim was to compare surgical outcomes in obese and nonobese patients after transoral robotic thyroid (TORT) surgery.Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Methods: A total of 304 consecutive patients who underwent TORT between January 2012 to December 2017 were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to their body mass index (BMI): BMI < 30 kg/m 2 and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 . Patient demographics, operative extent, pathological data, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were included and analyzed. A χ 2 test was used to compare categorical variables, and a Student t test was used to compare changes of continuous variables between groups. Statistical significance was conferred by a two-tailed P value of ≤.05.Results: There were 290 patients in the non-obese group and 14 patients in the obese group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient demographics, operative procedure, or pathological characteristics. The only statistically significant difference was for lymph node dissection (P = .012); however, for both groups, unilateral central node dissection was the most common procedure. There was also no statistically significant difference found for operative time, length of stay, pain score, or postoperative complications including TORT-specific complications such as oral commissure tear and general complications such as recurrent nerve injury.Conclusions: This initial experience shows that TORT appears to be a safe and feasible option for obese patients pursuing scarless thyroid surgery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.