The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of venous conduits used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We analyzed the portal vein complications in 66 LDLT recipients and 48 cadaveric reduced-size liver transplant (RLT) recipients performed from November 1989 through January 1995. Three different venous conduits were utilized in the LDLT recipients: Group 1, reconstructed vein from the living donor, n=18; Group 2, cadaveric cryopreserved iliac vein, n=37; and Group 3, cadaveric cryopreserved femoral vein, n=11. Overall, 47 percent of the patients were less than one year of age; the age distribution was not significantly different among the groups. The incidence of early thrombosis was significantly greater in LDLT Group 1, (33%) than any of the other groups (LDLT Group 2, 8%; LDLT Group 3, 9%; and RLT, 4%:P<0.0005 vs. reduced graft and < 0.03 vs. other LDLT groups). The incidence of late portal vein stenosis or thrombosis was significantly higher in the LDLT Group 2, (51%) than any of the other groups (LDLT 1, 16%; LDLT Group 3, 9%; RLT 4%;P<0.005 vs. cadaveric and < 0.02 vs. LDLT Group 1 and LDLT Group 3). Five year arterial graft and patient survival for patients who have experienced portal vein thrombosis or stenosis is 61% and 67%, respectively, versus 67% and 71% for those patients who have not experienced portal vein pathology, P=ns. Based on this experience, we recommend avoiding the use of cryopreserved iliac vein for portal vein reconstruction in liver transplantation. Every effort should be taken to eliminate the need for venous conduits in liver transplantation. If venous conduits must be utilized, cryopreserved femoral veins seem to provide superior patency rates. Careful clinical and ultrasonopraphic monitoring of patients at high risk for late venous thrombosis permits therapy with excellent graft and patient survival.

and 2 Multi-Organ Transplant Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA Liver transplantation (LT) with donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors has been associated with a high rate of ischemic-type biliary strictures (ITBSs) and inferior graft survival. To investigate the impact of an intraoperative tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) on outcomes following DCD LT, we conducted a retrospective analysis of DCD LT at the Toronto General Hospital (TGH) and the Ochsner Medical Center (OMC). Between 2009 and 2013, 85 DCD LTs were performed with an intraoperative tPA injection (n 5 30 at TGH, n 5 55 at OMC), and they were compared with 33 DCD LTs without a tPA. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the intraoperative packed red blood cell transfusion requirement (3.2 6 3.4 versus 3.1 6 2.3 U, P 5 0.74). Overall, biliary strictures occurred less commonly in the tPA-treated group (16.5% versus 33.3%, P 5 0.07) with a much lower rate of diffuse intrahepatic strictures (3.5% versus 21.2%, P 5 0.005). After 1 and 3 years, the tPA group versus the non-tPA group had superior patient survival (97.6% versus 87.0% and 92.7% versus 79.7%, P 5 0.016) and graft survival (96.4% versus 69.7% and 90.2% versus 63.6%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, a tPA injection into the hepatic artery during DCD LT reduces ITBSs and improves graft and patient survival without increasing the risk for bleeding. Liver Transpl 21:321-328, 2015. The use of liver transplantation (LT) as a lifesaving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease continues to be primarily limited by donor organ availability. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors represent an important potential source to expand the donor pool for LT. However, posttransplant outcomes following DCD LT have to date been inferior in comparison with outcomes following LT with donation after brain death (DBD) donors. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Despite an increased use of DCD livers in the early part of the past decade, utilization has decreased in recent years as a result of inferior outcomes. 9 Biliary complications are the main contributor to inferior outcomes in DCD LT, with reported biliary stricture rates between 30% and 50% (more than double the rate for LT from DBD donors). The higher rate

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation (LT) reportedly yields inferior survival and increased complication rates compared with donation after brain death (DBD). We compare 100 consecutive DCD LT using a protocol that includes thrombolytic therapy (late DCD group) to an historical DCD group (early DCD group n = 38) and a cohort of DBD LT recipients (DBD group n = 435). Late DCD LT recipients had better 1- and 3-year graft survival rates than early DCD LT recipients (92% vs. 76.3%, p = 0.03 and 91.4% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.01). Late DCD graft survival rates were comparable to those of the DBD group (92% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.24 and 91.4% vs. 88.2%, p = 0.62). Re-transplantation occurred in 18.4% versus 1% for the early and late DCD groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Patient survival was similar in all three groups. Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBL) occurred in 5%, 3%, and 0.2% for early DCD, late DCD, and DBD groups, respectively, but unlike in the early DCD group, in the late DCD group ITBL was endoscopically managed and resolved in each case. Using a protocol that includes a thrombolytic therapy, DCD LT yielded patient and graft survival rates comparable to DBD LT.

ObjectiveA review of 100 living-liver donors was performed to evaluate the perisurgical complications of the procedure and thus to help quantify the risks to the donor. Summary Background DataDespite the advantages of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), the procedure has received criticism for the risk it imposes on healthy persons. A paucity of data exists regarding the complications and relative safety of the procedure. MethodsOne hundred LDLTs performed between November 1989 and November 1996 were reviewed. Donor data were obtained by chart review, anesthesia records, and the computerized hospital data base. Patient variables were compared by Fisher's exact test and the Student's t test. ResultsThere were 57 women and 43 men with a median age of 29. Donors were divided into two groups: group A (first 50 donors), and group B (last 50 donors). There were 91 left lateral segments and 9 left lobes. There were no deaths. Fourteen major complications occurred in 13 patients; 9 occurred in group A and 5 in group B. Biliary complications consisted of five bile duct injuries (group A = 4, group B = 1) and two cut edge bile leaks. Complications were more common in left lobe resections (55%) than in left lateral segment grafts (10%). Minor complications occurred in 20% of patients. A significant reduction in overall complications (major and minor) was observed between the groups (group A, n = 24 [45%] vs. group B, n = 10 [20%]). In addition, surgical time and hospital stay were both significantly reduced. ConclusionsAlthough the procedure is safe, many LDLT donors have a perisurgical complication. Surgical experience and technical modifications have resulted in a significant reduction in these complications, however. To minimize the risks for these healthy donors, LDLT should be performed at institutions with extensive experience.

The living-donor liver transplant recipient operation has undergone significant technical changes since its introduction in 1989. These changes have decreased the vascular complications associated with this type of graft. Avoiding the use of vascular conduits and performing microvascular hepatic artery anastomoses are the critical steps in improving graft survival.