GABA receptor systems have long been implicated in alcoholism, and GABAergic drugs have demonstrated efficacy in altering alcohol intake in some rodent models. The present study was designed to assess the effects of baclofen, muscimol, and gaboxadol (THIP) in a variation on a new mouse model of binge-like ethanol intake. Three hours into their dark cycle, male and female C57BL/6J mice were given access to a 20% unsweetened ethanol solution for 2 h each day, for four days. On day five, mice received varying doses of baclofen, muscimol or THIP and were allowed access to 20% ethanol for 60 min. Baclofen dose-dependently increased binge-like ethanol intake, while both muscimol and THIP reduced ethanol intake. Subsequent studies testing the effect of baclofen, muscimol and THIP on water intake using the same procedure revealed that whereas baclofen had no significant effect, muscimol and THIP both reduced the measure. These results add to the growing literature suggesting a role for GABA receptor systems in the modulation of ethanol intake. However, whereas the role of GABA(B) receptor systems seems selective in the modulation of binge-like ethanol intake, the role for GABA(A) receptor systems appears to also extend to general fluid intake.

Background: Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder affecting sociocommunicative behavior, but also sensorimotor skill learning, oculomotor control, and executive functioning. Some of these impairments may be related to abnormalities of the caudate nuclei, which have been reported for autism.

Background-Alcohol use is common during the adolescent period, a time at which a number of crucial neurobiological, hormonal, and behavioral changes occur (Spear, 2000). In order to more fully understand the complex interaction between alcohol use and these age-typical neurobiological changes, animal models must be utilized. Rodents experience a developmental period similar to that of adolescence. Although rat models have shown striking adolescent-specific differences in sensitivity to ethanol, little work has been done in mice despite the fact that the C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA2/J (D2) mice have been shown to markedly differ in ethanol preference drinking and exhibit widely different sensitivities to ethanol.

Background There is considerable research examining differences in adolescent and adult sensitivity and tolerance to ethanol related behavioral phenotypes. However, the available published data has almost exclusively assessed these behaviors in outbred rats. The present study was conducted using the alcohol preferring inbred mouse strain C57BL/6J (B6) and the alcohol non-preferring inbred mouse strain DBA/2J (D2) to determine if differences in the sedative and ataxic effects of ethanol exist between adolescents and adults, and to determine whether there are any genetic influences involved therein. Methods Adolescent and adult mice of each sex and genotype were given intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of ethanol (1.5, 1.75 or 4.0 g/kg) or saline and assessed for the loss of righting reflex (LORR) or hind footslips on the balance beam apparatus. These animals were then tested for the development of tolerance to these behaviors on subsequent days. Results Despite evident pharmacokinetic differences, D2 adults were found to be relatively more sensitive than their adolescent D2 counterparts in addition to B6 animals of both age groups. Furthermore, although adult animals appeared to develop significantly greater degrees of tolerance to ethanol-induced hypnosis compared to adolescents, these effects are likely in part related to differences in ethanol absorption/metabolism across time. Taking into account pharmacokinetic differences and the overall poor performance of male adults, adolescent animals were found to be equally if not more sensitive to the motor incoordinating (ataxic) effects of ethanol. Overall, tolerance to these effects varied by age and genotype but appeared to be related to changes in ethanol pharmacokinetics rather than strict behavioral sensitivity. Conclusion The current work suggests that adolescent B6 and D2 inbred mice exhibit ontogenetic differences in sensitivity to ethanol’s hypnotic and ataxic effects. Importantly, in some cases age differences emerge as a function of differential ethanol pharmacokinetics. These results extend the current literature examining this critical developmental period in mice and illustrate the benefits of comparing ethanol related developmental differences in different genetic mouse populations.