The diffusion of a liquid polymer into a glassy polymer matrix has been studied in a range of temperatures below the glassy matrix glass transition temperature (T g) and for different diffusion times. The liquid polymer used is low-molecular-weight polystyrene (PS) with a narrow molecular weight distribution, and the glassy matrix is poly(phenylene oxide); the two are miscible at any concentration. A simple physical diffusion model is proposed to correlate and predict diffusion rates, assuming a relatively rapid dissolution of the high-Tg polymer at the liquid-solid interface and a relatively slow diffusion process that produces a thick interphase. The local chemical compositions, local glass transition temperatures, and local PS monomeric friction coefficients change markedly along the diffusion path across the interphase; these changes are well predicted by the diffusion model and have also been experimentally verified. The large changes in local T g values cause huge changes in the PS monomeric friction factor across the interphase, and this fact explains the asymmetrical local chemical composition profiles experimentally measured for the PS-rich interphase. The results obtained by other authors for the diffusion of liquid polymers and bulky plasticizers into glassy matrixes are analyzed and discussed on the basis of the diffusion model predictions, and it is found that all of them behave following the same pattern as was observed in our experiments. It is concluded that the Case II diffusion mechanism must not be expected for the diffusion of liquid polymers into glassy matrixes, because of the negligible osmotic pressure. Furthermore, all of the analyzed data for diffusion of liquid polymers and bulky plasticizers into glassy matrixes show evidence for relatively rapid dissolution of the glassy matrix at the interface, together with a relatively slow diffusion process across the interphase.

Liquid−liquid diffusion at the interphase between poly(vinyl−methyl ether) (PVME) and polystyrene (PS) was experimentally studied using confocal Raman microspectroscopy. A combination of a specially designed experimental setup and a direct and precise quantification for the corrections to be applied to the Raman measurements allowed us to measure directly the PVME concentration along the diffusion path for a wide range of diffusion times. An already proposed and tested liquid−liquid diffusion model (based on liquid dynamics controlled by monomeric friction coefficients) was used to correlate and predict the detailed shape of the PVME concentration profiles and the diffusion rates as functions of diffusion time and temperature. The results obtained allowed us to discern among several approaches previously proposed in the literature to calculate monomeric friction coefficients in this system. Only the approach that considers independent monomeric friction coefficient values for PS and PVME (obtained from tracer diffusion measurements) gave good agreement between experimental results and model calculations. Calculations performed using literature data for a common monomeric friction coefficient for both PS and PVME (obtained from estimated blend viscosity data) do not agree with experimental measurements. The success of the model used for this work clearly ruled out the need for combinations of Fickean and Case II models used previously to describe PS−PVME polymer diffusion.