Background: In 1995 a meta-analysis of randomised trials investigating the value of adding chemotherapy to primary treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) suggested a small survival benefit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy in each of the primary treatment settings. However, the metaanalysis included many small trials and trials with differing eligibility criteria and chemotherapy regimens. Methods: The aim of the Big Lung Trial was to confirm the survival benefits seen in the meta-analysis and to assess quality of life and cost in the supportive care setting. A total of 725 patients were randomised to receive supportive care alone (n = 361) or supportive care plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy (n = 364). Results: 65% of patients allocated chemotherapy (C) received all three cycles of treatment and a further 27% received one or two cycles. 74% of patients allocated no chemotherapy (NoC) received thoracic radiotherapy compared with 47% of the C group. Patients allocated C had a significantly better survival than those allocated NoC: HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.89, p = 0.0006), median survival 8.0 months for the C group v 5.7 months for the NoC group, a difference of 9 weeks. There were 19 (5%) treatment related deaths in the C group. There was no evidence that any subgroup benefited more or less from chemotherapy. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the pre-defined primary and secondary quality of life end points, although large negative effects of chemotherapy were ruled out. The regimens used proved to be cost effective, the extra cost of chemotherapy being offset by longer survival. Conclusions: The survival benefit seen in this trial was entirely consistent with the NSCLC meta-analysis and subsequent similarly designed large trials. The information on quality of life and cost should enable patients and their clinicians to make more informed treatment choices.

This randomised controlled multicentre trial evaluated the effectiveness of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in preventing anaemia and reducing the need for blood or erythrocyte transfusion in 122 ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were randomly allocated to receive rhEPO 150 U/kg or 300 U/kg subcutaneously, three times a week, or open control. Patients also received up to 6 cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin, alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 39.4% of patients in the control group received at least one blood transfusion, compared with 9.2% of patients treated with rhEPO. Patients treated with rhEPO experienced a significantly longer time to first erythrocyte transfusion than the control group and were less likely to experience nadir haemoglobin levels < 10 g/dl (P < 0.001 and < 0.05, respectively). A haemoglobin decrease < 1 g/dl during the first chemotherapy cycle, as well as a low baseline serum erythropoietin concentration, predicted a low transfusion need in rhEPO-treated patients but not in controls. During the study, 103 patients suffered at least one adverse event, but no serious, and only nine non-serious adverse events were considered possibly related to rhEPO therapy. These results indicate that treatment with rhEPO prevents anaemia, it reduces the need for blood or rhEPO erythrocyte transfusion in patients with ovarian cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, and it is well tolerated. A starting dose of 150 U/kg of rhEPO, three times a week, may be recommended.

There were no important adverse effects of chemotherapy on QoL.