IMPORTANCE Strategies to increase access to palliative care, particularly for racial/ethnic minorities, must maximize primary palliative care and community-based models to meet the ever-growing need in a culturally sensitive and congruent manner. OBJECTIVE To investigate if a culturally tailored patient navigator intervention can improve palliative care outcomes for Latino adults with advanced cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Apoyo con Cariño (Support With Caring) randomized clinical trial was conducted from July 2012 to March 2016. The setting was clinics across the state of Colorado, including an academic National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center, community cancer clinics (urban and rural), and a safety-net cancer center. Participants were adults who self-identified as Latino and were being treated for advanced cancer. INTERVENTION Culturally tailored patient navigator intervention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome measures were advance care planning in the medical record, the Brief Pain Inventory, and hospice use. Secondary outcome measures included the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL), hospice length of stay, and aggressiveness of care at the end of life. This study used an intent-to-treat design. RESULTS In total, 223 Latino adults enrolled (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [13.6] years; 55.6% female) and were randomized to control (n = 111) or intervention (n = 112) groups. Intervention group patients were more likely to have a documented advance directive compared with control group patients (73 of 112 [65.2%] vs 40 of 111 [36.0%], P < .001). Both groups reported mild pain intensity (mean pain rating of 3 on a scale of 0-10). Intervention group patients had a mean (SD) reported change from baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory pain severity subscale score (range, 0-10) of 0.1 (2.6) vs 0.2 (2.7) in control group patients (P = .88) and a mean (SD) reported change from baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory pain interference subscale score of 0.1 (3.2) vs −0.2 (3.0) in control group patients (P = .66). Hospice use was similar in both groups. Secondary outcomes of overall MQOL score and aggressiveness of care at the end of life showed no significant differences between groups. The MQOL physical subscale showed a mean (SD) significant change from baseline of 1.4 (3.1) in the intervention group vs 0.1 (3.0) in the control group (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The intervention had mixed results. The intervention increased advance care planning and improved physical symptoms; however, it had no effect on pain management and hospice use or overall quality of life. Further research is needed to determine the role and scope of lay navigators in palliative care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01695382

Outpatient and hospital neurologists should routinely address advance directives, particularly as the proportion of patients with chronic neurological diagnoses increases.

35%, respectively), p<0.0001 and p¼0.001, would recommend hospice for loved ones (88%) or themselves (88%) in intervention group compared to control (65% and 66% respectively), p¼0.0004 and 0.0005. Conclusion. A culturally tailored patient navigator intervention can increase advance care planning and help patients align with a palliative approach in Latinos with advanced cancer. Implications for research, policy or practice. An effective, widely disseminated patient navigator intervention has the potential to reduce cancer-related disparities, improve PC for cancer patients, and improve access to quality PC care in rural communities.

We present and describe tailored strategies to address known barriers to minority participation in clinical trial research. The strategies used allowed our team to engage communities and successfully recruit, enroll, and retain a diverse underserved population of Latinos with advanced cancer for this clinical trial. Participants were recruited from 3 urban and 7 rural sites. We identified 4 critical barriers to recruitment for this underserved population: (1) mistrust; (2) language and communication barriers; (3) lack of access to academic cancer center; and (4) inability to participate due to transportation, childcare, or work responsibilities. We developed tailored strategies to engage referring sites and patients to participate in the clinical trial. We identified 318 potentially eligible participants; 34 were found to be ineligible, and 223 consented to participate in the study, representing a 79.0% enrollment rate. All patients (100%) self-identified as Latino, and 47.5% spoke Spanish as their primary language. Patients were socioeconomically disadvantaged: 53.6% had an annual income <$15,000 USD, and 50.2% had less than a high school education. A total of 177 participants completed the 3-month follow-up; 26 died before the 3-month follow interview, and 20 did not complete the follow-up evaluation (9% withdrawal rate). Our community-informed strategies were highly effective for recruiting, enrolling, and retaining an underserved diverse population of Latinos. The barriers we identified and the strategies we used have the potential to inform research to increase minority participation in cancer clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01695382.

No abstract