Background and purpose Myasthenia gravis (MG) patients could be a vulnerable group in the pandemic era of coronavirus 2019 (COVID‐19) mainly due to respiratory muscle weakness, older age and long‐term immunosuppressive treatment. We aimed to define factors predicting the severity of COVID‐19 in MG patients and risk of MG exacerbation during COVID‐19. Methods We evaluated clinical features and outcomes after COVID‐19 in 93 MG patients. Results Thirty‐five patients (38%) had severe pneumonia and we recorded 10 deaths (11%) due to COVID‐19. Higher forced vital capacity (FVC) values tested before COVID‐19 were shown to be protective against severe infection (95% CI 0.934–0.98) as well as good control of MG measured by the quantified myasthenia gravis score (95% CI 1.047–1.232). Long‐term chronic corticosteroid treatment worsened the course of COVID‐19 in MG patients (95% CI 1.784–111.43) and this impact was positively associated with dosage ( p = 0.005). Treatment using azathioprine (95% CI 0.448–2.935), mycophenolate mofetil (95% CI 0.91–12.515) and ciclosporin (95% CI 0.029–2.212) did not influence the course of COVID‐19. MG patients treated with rituximab had a high risk of death caused by COVID‐19 (95% CI 3.216–383.971). Exacerbation of MG during infection was relatively rare (15%) and was not caused by remdesivir, convalescent plasma or favipiravir (95% CI 0.885–10.87). Conclusions As the most important predictors of severe COVID‐19 in MG patients we identified unsatisfied condition of MG with lower FVC, previous long‐term corticosteroid treatment especially in higher doses, older age, the presence of cancer, and recent rituximab treatment.

Cancer is a chronic disease requiring long-term treatment. Exercise interventions are increasingly being recognized as an important part of treatment and supportive cancer care for patients and survivors. Previous reviews have evaluated the benefits of exercise interventions in populations of patients under supervision at a center, but none have explored the possibilities of a home-based (HB) approach in exercise during cancer rehabilitation and the period immediately following the end of cancer treatment. The aim of this descriptive systematic review was to identify the literature focusing on the health effects of HB exercise interventions in cancer survivors and to evaluate the methodological quality of the examined studies. Relevant studies were identified by a systematic search of PubMed and the Web of Science until January 2021. Nine randomized controlled trials were included. Most studies were on aerobic and resistance exercises, and the frequency, duration, intensity, and modality varied across the different interventions. Improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), physical activity (PA) levels, fatigue, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and body composition have been reported. However, all the studies were limited in methodology and the reporting of results. Nevertheless, the evidence in this new area, despite the methodological limitations of the studies, suggests that HB exercise interventions are feasible, and may provide physiological and psychological benefits for cancer survivors during the rehabilitation period. A methodologically rigorous design for future research is essential for making progress in this field of study.

No abstract