Toxicologic pathology is transitioning from analog to digital methods. This transition seems inevitable due to a host of ongoing social and medical technological forces. Of these, artificial intelligence (AI) and in particular machine learning (ML) are globally disruptive, rapidly growing sectors of technology whose impact on the long-established field of histopathology is quickly being realized. The development of increasing numbers of algorithms, peering ever deeper into the histopathological space, has demonstrated to the scientific community that AI pathology platforms are now poised to truly impact the future of precision and personalized medicine. However, as with all great technological advances, there are implementation and adoption challenges. This review aims to define common and relevant AI and ML terminology, describe data generation and interpretation, outline current and potential future business cases, discuss validation and regulatory hurdles, and most importantly, propose how overcoming the challenges of this burgeoning technology may shape toxicologic pathology for years to come, enabling pathologists to contribute even more effectively to answering scientific questions and solving global health issues. [Box: see text]

Historically, pathologists perform manual evaluation of H&E-or immunohistochemically-stained slides, which can be subjective, inconsistent, and, at best, semiquantitative. As the complexity of staining and demand for increased precision of manual evaluation increase, the pathologist's assessment will include automated analyses (i.e., ''digital pathology'') to increase the accuracy, efficiency, and speed of diagnosis and hypothesis testing and as an important biomedical research and diagnostic tool. This commentary introduces the many roles for pathologists in designing and conducting high-throughput digital image analysis. Pathology review is central to the entire course of a digital pathology study, including experimental design, sample quality verification, specimen annotation, analytical algorithm development, and report preparation. The pathologist performs these roles by reviewing work undertaken by technicians and scientists with training and expertise in image analysis instruments and software. These roles require regular, face-to-face interactions between team members and the lead pathologist. Traditional pathology training is suitable preparation for entry-level participation on image analysis teams. The future of pathology is very exciting, with the expanding utilization of digital image analysis set to expand pathology roles in research and drug development with increasing and new career opportunities for pathologists.

The approach undertaken to deliver a Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) validation of whole slide images (WSIs) and the associated workflow for the digital primary evaluation and peer review of a GLP-compliant rodent inhalation toxicity study is described. The contract research organization (CRO) undertook validation of the slide scanner, scanner software, and associated database software. This provided a GLP validated environment within the database software for the primary histopathologic evaluation using WSI and viewed with the database software web viewer. The CRO also validated a cloud-based digital pathology platform that supported the upload and transfer of WSI and metadata to a cache within the sponsor's local area network. The sponsor undertook a separate GLP validation of the same cloud-based digital pathology platform to cover the download and review of the WSI. The establishment of a fit-for-purpose GLP-compliant workflow for WSI and successful deployment for the digital primary evaluation and peer review of a large GLP toxicology study enabled flexibility in accelerated global working and potential future reuse of digitized data for advanced artificial intelligence and machine learning image analysis.