No salvage treatment strategy has been established for relapsed or refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We compared treatment outcomes of patients who underwent salvage chemotherapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We retrospectively analyzed PCNSL patients who were histologically diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. All patients relapsed after high-dose methotrexate (MTX)-based chemotherapy, or were refractory to high-dose MTX. Patients were treated with salvage chemotherapy, such as ICE/D (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and dexamethasone) or high-dose MTX. High-dose chemotherapy containing thiotepa and busulfan followed by ASCT was performed if patients were eligible for ASCT after salvage treatment. Forty-five patients (35 relapsed and 10 refractory) received ICE/D or high-dose MTX. Despite the important difference that ICE/D was used predominantly for early relapsed or refractory patients, the two salvage treatments produced similar overall response rates [84.4 % (38/45) for ICE/D and 81.3 % (13/16) for high-dose MTX re-treatment]. Eighteen patients underwent ASCT, whereas 27 patients received salvage chemotherapy alone. The median progression-free survival of patients who underwent ASCT (19.5 months) was significantly better than that of patients who did not receive ASCT (6.7 months, P = 0.023). Multivariate analysis showed that refractoriness to initial treatment and no ASCT were significantly associated with poor survival outcome. Our study suggested that the combination of ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and dexamethasone may represent a feasible salvage treatment option for relapsed or refractory PCNSL, and that high-dose chemotherapy containing thiotepa and busulfan followed by ASCT may be effective for patients with a favorable toxicity profile.

Objective: We evaluated the prognostic value of tumor deposit (TD) counts and incorporated them with the number of positive lymph nodes to develop a revised nodal staging. Summary Background Data: The current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging on colon cancer includes the TDs only for nodenegative patients, as N1c, and their counts are not considered. Methods: We included consecutive patients with stage III colorectal cancer who underwent curative resections between January 2010 and December 2019. The patients were grouped as TD 0, TD 1, TD 2, or TD ≥3 based on their TD counts. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared. Results: Of 2446 eligible stage III patients, 658 (26.9%) had TDs. Among them, 500 (76.0%) patients concurrently had positive lymph nodes (LNs). TD counts were significantly related to worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival regardless of pT stages or the number of positive LNs. The patients were restaged based on the integrated number of TD counts and positive LNs. The N3 stage, which had ≥10 integrated TDs and positive LNs, was newly classified. Among the patients who completed 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy, those upstaged to N2 from an initial stage of N1 experienced significantly worse DFS than those confirmed as N1 in the revised N staging. The newly N3-staged patients showed significantly worse DFS than the patients initially staged as N2. Conclusions: Revised N staging using the integrated number of TD counts and positive LNs could predict DFS more accurately than current staging. It would also draw greater attention to the patients with highrisk stage III colon cancer staged as N3.

Purpose: The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups.Methods: From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared.Results: Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392).Conclusion: Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.