Nosocomial infections are acquired during hospital treatment or in a hospital environment. One such infecting agent, Escherichia coli, harbours many virulence genes that enable it to become pathogenic, causing damage to the host. The mechanism of the E. coli virulence factors provenance to cause infection in host environments is not clearly elucidated. We investigated the virulence and pathogenicity of E. coli affected by the host environment. For this, blood (n = 78) and faecal (n = 83) E. coli isolates were collected from patients with and without sepsis, respectively, who had been admitted to the intensive care unit. The E. coli genomic DNA was isolated; the phylogenetic grouping was conducted by triplex PCR. The occurrence of nine virulence genes among the all the isolates was confirmed by gene-specific PCR. The prevalence of E. coli in blood isolates was more in phylogenetic groups B2 and D compared to groups A and B1. However, in faecal isolates, there was no significant difference. The prevalence of adhesin and toxin (papG, sfa, afa, cnf1, hlyA) genes was higher in blood compared to faecal E. coli isolates. However, the prevalence of aer, traT and PAI was similar as well as higher among both of these groups. These observations indicate a role of external environment (hospital setting) on host susceptibility (development of infection) in the faecal E. coli isolates, thereby making the patient prone to a sepsis condition.
The prevalence of the tcpC in the blood Escherichia coli isolates collected from the sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit was investigated for the first time. The blood and faecal samples were collected from sepsis and nonsepsis patients, respectively. The prevalence of the tcpC and phylogroups was confirmed by gene-specific PCR. The occurrence of the tcpC in the blood E. coli isolates from sepsis patients was significantly higher than the faecal isolates. The higher prevalence of blood E. coli isolates among the pathogenic groups (B2, D) compared to the commensal groups (A, B1) suggests tcpC as a prospective new virulence marker for sepsis.
Study Design: Retrospective analysis. Objective: Lumbar disc herniation is one the most common condition responsible for low back and radicular pain. Although the symptoms are not proportional to the size of disc prolapse but massive disc herniation frequently needs surgical management. According to literature, the incidence of low back pain, recurrent disc herniation and segmental instability are more in discectomy whereas incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is more after fusion surgery. There are very few studies that directly compare long-term functional outcome of both these procedures. We compared the functional outcome of both the procedures in this study. Methods: All patients of massive disc prolapse, operated at our center between 2011 to 2017, were contacted. All the patients underwent either discectomy or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Functional outcomes of all the patients were collected using visual analogue scale (VAS) (back), VAS (leg), modified Oswestry Disability Index (mODI), Sciatica Bothersomeness Index (SBI), and McNab’s criterion. Various complications were also analyzed. Results: There were 144 patients in the discectomy group and 123 patients in the TLIF group. Mean duration of follow-up was 55.07 months and 51.86 months, respectively. Both the groups show no significant difference in VAS. Significant difference was seen in mODI and SBI favoring discectomy. McNab’s criterion showed excellent result in 80% of patients of discectomy compared with 68% patients of TLIF. Overall complication rate in discectomy group was 11% whereas 13% in TLIF group. Conclusion: Both show good functional outcome but better in discectomy. Recurrent herniation and instability were noticed more with discectomy and ASD was more common after fusion surgeries. The choice of procedure should be individualized, and it also depends on surgical expertise, but in developing countries where resources are constrained, discectomy should be preferred.
Escherichia vulneris is an opportunistic human pathogen. It has been primarily reported in adult patients and invasive infections have been observed in immune-suppressed individuals. This is the first report of E. vulneris causing complicated diarrhoea and sepsis in an infant.Two month old sick infant, born full-term, was admitted to the paediatrics department with loose motions and refusal to feed for four days. E. vulneris was isolated from blood in pure culture. The isolate was characterized for diarrhoeal virulence markers: heat labile and heat stable toxins (LT, ST) and hemolysin (hlyA) by PCR. The presence of LT enterotoxin and hemolysin provides strong evidence of the diarrhoeagenic potential of E. vulneris, further leading to the invasive infection triggering sepsis.As E. vulneris can lead to serious complications, an attempt should be made in clinical laboratories to identify and further characterize this new Escherichia species.
A 62-year-old man with asthma sought care for intermittent fever, cough with expectoration, breathlessness and orthopnoea with grunting. Computed tomography revealed clusters of centrilobular nodules on both sides with a tree-in-bud appearance and mild diffuse bronchial wall thickening. Sputum sample grew pure colonies of Actinobacillus ureae which was confirmed by MALDI-TOF and 16SrRNA gene sequencing. A. ureae may be an additional bacteriologic causative agent of the tree-in-bud pattern on computed tomographic scan.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.