Background: Tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, targets IL-6 receptors blocking downstream proinflammatory effects of IL-6. In preliminary reports it was suggested to be beneficial in patients with severe In this open-label prospective study we describe clinical characteristics and outcome of 51 patients hospitalized with confirmed and severe COVID-19 pneumonia treated with tocilizumab intravenously. All patients had elevated IL-6 plasma level (>40 pg/mL) and oxygen saturation <93% in ambient air. Clinical outcomes, oxygen support, laboratory data and adverse events were collected over a follow-up of 30 days. Results: Forty-five patients (88%) were on high-flow oxygen supplementation, six of whom with invasive ventilation. From baseline to day 7 after tocilizumab we observed a dramatic drop of body temperature and CRP value with a significant increase in lymphocyte count (p<0.001). Over a median follow-up time of 34 days from tocilizumab, 34 patients (67%) showed an improvement in their clinical severity class; 31 were discharged; 17 (33%) showed a worsening of their clinical status, of these 14 died (27%). The mortality rate was significantly associated with mechanical ventilation at baseline (83.3% vs 20% of patients on non-invasive oxygen support; p=0.0001). The most frequent side effects were an increase of hepatic enzymes (29%), thrombocytopenia (14%), and serious bacterial and fungal infections (27%). Conclusion: Tocilizumab exerts a rapidly beneficial effect on fever and inflammatory markers, although no significant impact on the clinical outcome can be inferred by our results. Critically ill patients seem to have a high risk of serious infections with this drug.

In 26 consecutive cases with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) the main cardiac findings were Kaposi's sarcoma in 2 cases, microfocal myocardial abscess in 1, subendocardial infarct necrosis in 2, contraction band necrosis in 13, lymphocytic myocarditis in 9, intramyocardial lymphocytic infiltrates without myocell necrosis in 7 and epicardial lymphocytic infiltrates in 4. No patient had congestive heart failure. However, two-dimensional echocardiography performed in eight patients demonstrated functional abnormalities in six (fractional shortening ranging from 18 to 30%, globular shape, hypokinesia, mild ventricular dilation). Four of these six patients had lymphocytic myocarditis and two had lymphocytic infiltrates in the myocardium and epicardium without myocell necrosis. No lymphocytic infiltrates were seen in the two cases with a normal echocardiogram. Quantitative analysis indicated that involvement of the heart by lymphocytic myocarditis is inadequate in itself to explain dysfunction. It remains to be established 1) whether lymphocytic myocarditis is a possible indication of a more widespread molecular disorder, and 2) what its eventual relation with dilated cardiomyopathy will be.

Introduction This paper describes how mortality among hospitalised COVID-19 patients changed during the first three waves of the epidemic in Italy. Methods This prospective cohort study used the Kaplan-Meier method to analyse the time-dependent probability of death of all of the patients admitted to a COVID-19 referral centre in Milan, Italy, during the three consecutive periods of: 21 February-31 July 2020 (first wave, W1), 1 August 2020–31 January 2021 (second wave, W2), and 1 February-30 April 2021 (third wave, W3). Cox models were used to examine the association between death and the period of admission after adjusting for age, biological sex, the time from symptom onset to admission, disease severity upon admission, obesity, and the comorbidity burden. Results Of the 2,023 COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital during the study period, 553 (27.3%) were admitted during W1, 838 (41.5%) during W2, and 632 (31.2%) during W3. The crude mortality rate during W1, W2 and W3 was respectively 21.3%, 23.7% and 15.8%. After adjusting for potential confounders, hospitalisation during W2 or W3 was independently associated with a significantly lower risk of death than hospitalisation during W1 (adjusted hazard ratios [AHRs]: 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.95, and 0.58, 95% CI 0.44–0.77). Among the patients aged >75 years, there was no significant difference in the probability of death during the three waves (AHRs during W2 and W3 vs W1: 0.93, 95% CI 0.65–1.33, and 0.88, 95% CI 0.59–1.32), whereas those presenting with critical disease during W2 and W3 were at significantly lower risk of dying than those admitted during W1 (AHRs 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.88, and 0.44, 95% CI 0.28–0.70). Conclusions Hospitalisation during W2 and W3 was associated with a reduced risk of COVID-19 death in comparison with W1, but there was no difference in survival probability in patients aged >75 years.