In contrast to results of large randomized trials, statins were independently and significantly associated with lower mortality risk in our real-life HF cohort, including patients with nonischemic HF etiology.
AimsHeart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that typically affects a patient's quality of life (QoL). Little is known about long-term QoL monitoring in HF. This study aimed to evaluate the temporal changes and prognostic value of QoL assessment in a real-life cohort of HF patients.
Methods and resultsThe Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire was used to monitor QoL at baseline and at 1, 3, and 5 years for 1151 consecutive patients {71.7% men, median age 69 years [25th-75th percentiles (P 25 -P 75 ) 59-76]} in an HF unit. Follow-up for prognosis assessment was extended to 6 years. The number of answered questionnaires was 1151 at baseline, 746 at 1 year, 268 at 3 years, and 240 at 5 years. QoL scores showed a steep decrease (indicating QoL improvement) during the first year [29 (P 25 -P 75 16 -43) at baseline vs. 15 (P 25 -P 75 8-27) at 1 year, P , 0.001], which was tempered, yet significant up to 5 years [12 (P 25 -P 75 7-23) at 3 years vs. 10 (P 25 -P 75 5 -21) at 5 years, P ¼ 0.012]. We recorded 457 deaths during follow-up. In a comprehensive multivariable Cox regression analysis, baseline QoL remained a significant prognosticator during follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) Cox for death 1.012, 95% confidence interval 1.006 -1.018, P , 0.001]. QoL monitoring showed that a score increase ≥ 10% between consecutive assessments stratified high-risk patients within the next 12 months (P ¼ 0.008).
ConclusionBoth baseline and follow-up QoL monitoring were useful for patient risk stratification in a real-life HF cohort. Worse QoL may warn of a worse prognosis. Widespread QoL monitoring in routine clinical practice is recommended.--
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.